Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27430018›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of robotic surgery2015

The Value of the

Dinesh Vyas, Archana Balakrishnan, Arpita Vyas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of robotic surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dinesh VyasCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Archana BalakrishnanCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Arpita VyasCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Funding

Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health at Michigan StateK12HD065879 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOLZMAN, CLAUDIA B. · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the discussion on the implications of irreproducibility in the sciences has been brought into the spotlight. This topic has been discussed for years in the literature. A multitude of reasons have been attributed to this issue; one commonly labeled culprit is the overuse of the

Indexed as

Data AnalysisIrreproducibility in Researchp-ValueP ValueStatistical ModelingStatistics

Identifiers

PMID27430018
PMCPMC4946645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.