Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429966›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2016

Proton pump inhibitors and risk of dementia.

Karn Wijarnpreecha, Charat Thongprayoon, Panadeekarn Panjawatanan, Patompong Ungprasert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Dementia: Is There a Link?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karn WijarnpreechaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA ;
Charat ThongprayoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA ;
Panadeekarn PanjawatananDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand ;
Patompong UngprasertDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA;; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications. Recent studies have raised a concern over increased risk of dementia among PPIs users but the results of those studies were inconsistent. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all available data.

methodsA literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE database from inception to April 2016. Observational studies that reported risk of dementia among PPIs users compared with non-users were included. Point estimates were extracted from individual studies and pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method.

resultsFour studies were included in the analysis. Pooled RR of dementia among PPIs users compared with non-users was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.43). Sensitivity analysis including only cohort studies demonstrated a higher risk with pooled RR of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.36-1.52).

conclusionsOur study demonstrated an increased risk of dementia among PPIs users. Whether this association is causal requires further investigations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedementiameta-analysisProton pump inhibitors (PPIs)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID27429966
PMCPMC4930512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.