Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429898›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmacology reports

Top-down, Bottom-up and Middle-out Strategies for Drug Cardiac Safety Assessment via Modeling and Simulations.

Zofia Tylutki, Sebastian Polak, Barbara Wiśniowska

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmacology reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of disposition and drug-drug interactions for valproic acid and divalproex.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zofia TylutkiUnit of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 9 Str., 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
Sebastian PolakUnit of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 9 Str., 30-688 Cracow, Poland ; Simcyp Ltd. (part of Certara), Blades Enterprise Centre, S2 4SU Sheffield, UK.
Barbara WiśniowskaUnit of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 9 Str., 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac safety is an issue causing early terminations at various stages of drug development. Efforts are put into the elimination of false negatives as well as false positives resulting from the current testing paradigm. In silico approaches offer mathematical system and data description from the ion current, through cardiomyocytes level, up to incorporation of inter-individual variability at the population level. The article aims to review three main modelling and simulation approaches, i.e. "top-down" which refers to models built on the observed data, "bottom-up", which stands for a mechanistic description of human physiology, and "middle-out" which combines both strategies. Modelling and simulation is a well-established tool in the assessment of drug proarrhythmic potency with an impact on research and development as well as on regulatory decisions, and it is certainly here to stay. What is more, the shift to systems biology and physiology-based models makes the cardiac effect more predictable.

Indexed as

Drug safetyModellingProarrhythmic effectSimulation

Identifiers

PMID27429898
PMCPMC4929154
OpenAlexW2328022676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.