Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429869›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center.

Shahnjayla K Connors, Melody S Goodman, Terence Myckatyn, Julie Margenthaler, Sarah Gehlert

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Racial Disparities in Breast Reconstruction at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors associated with the desire to undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in a Mexican breast cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Reconstruction Utilization Following Oncologic Resection.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shahnjayla K ConnorsDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.
Melody S GoodmanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.
Terence MyckatynDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.
Julie MargenthalerDivision of Endocrine Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.
Sarah GehlertDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA ; George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153460 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast reconstruction after mastectomy is an integral part of breast cancer treatment that positively impacts quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Although breast reconstruction rates have increased over time, African American women remain less likely to receive breast reconstruction compared to Caucasian women. National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, specialized institutions with more standardized models of cancer treatment, report higher breast reconstruction rates than primary healthcare facilities. Whether breast reconstruction disparities are reduced for women treated at comprehensive cancer centers is unclear. The purpose of this study was to further investigate breast reconstruction rates and determinants at a comprehensive cancer center in St. Louis, Missouri.

methodsSociodemographic and clinical data were obtained for women who received mastectomy for definitive surgical treatment for breast cancer between 2000 and 2012. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the receipt of breast reconstruction.

resultsWe found a breast reconstruction rate of 54 % for the study sample. Women who were aged 55 and older, had public insurance, received unilateral mastectomy, and received adjuvant radiation therapy were significantly less likely to receive breast reconstruction. African American women were 30 % less likely to receive breast reconstruction than Caucasian women.

conclusionThese findings suggest that racial disparities in breast reconstruction persist in comprehensive cancer centers. Future research should further delineate the determinants of breast reconstruction disparities across various types of healthcare institutions. Only then can we develop interventions to ensure all eligible women have access to breast reconstruction and the improved quality of life it affords breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast reconstructionComprehensive cancer centerDisparitiesMastectomy

Identifiers

PMID27429869
PMCPMC4930439
OpenAlexW2463726500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.