ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2016
Independent validation of a mathematical genomic model for survival of glioma patients.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- OCIAD2 Promotes Cancer Progression via Metabolic Reprogramming in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Knockdown of Anoikis-Associated Gene OCIAD2 Reduces Proliferation and Migration of Glioblastoma Cell Lines.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Proteomics separates adult-type diffuse high-grade gliomas in metabolic subgroups independent of 1p/19q codeletion and across IDH mutational status.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Protocadherin 15 suppresses oligodendrocyte progenitor cell proliferation and promotes motility through distinct signalling pathways.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Enhancer RNAs Identifies LINC00689 and ELFN1-AS1 as Novel Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Ovarian carcinoma immunoreactive antigen domain 2 controls mitochondrial apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer science · 2021Article
- Identification and Validation of an Immune-Related eRNA Prognostic Signature for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Beyond IDH-Mutation: Emerging Molecular Diagnostic and Prognostic Features in Adult Diffuse Gliomas.Cancers · 2020Review
- Cellular and molecular architecture of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors in genetic models of bone marrow failure.JCI insight · 2020Article
- Whole Exome and Transcriptome RNA-Sequencing Model for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Glioblastoma Patients with Unexpectedly Long Survival.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An independent cohort study was conducted to validate a mathematical genomic model for survival of glioma patients that was introduced previously. Of the 102 new subjects that were employed in this study, 40 were long-term survivors (survival ≥ 3 years), and 62 were short-term survivors (survival ≤ 1 year). Utilizing the gene expression of 5 genes as captured by mRNA sequencing of primary tumor tissue, obtained from the initial biopsy during the diagnosis, and prior to the administration of any treatment, the model classified correctly all but three of the 102 subjects. More specifically, of the 62 STS (short-term survivors), 61 were classified correctly (sensitivity = 98.4%); and of the 40 LTS (long-term survivors), 38 were classified correctly (specificity = 95.0%). The 5 gene expression input variables to the model were: FAM120AOS, MXI1, OCIAD2, PCDH15, and PDLIM4. Of the top 29 most significantly differentially expressed genes between STS and LTS subjects, as identified in the original study, all but one were highly significant. Furthermore, with respect to survival, the model - designed to operate at the molecular level (gene expression of tumor cells) - was also able to statistically differentiate between the two subgroups of the STS group, namely, the STS subjects with lower grade glioma and the STS subjects with glioblastoma; whereas variables either at the tissue level or at the organismal level were not able to do so. Based on these results, and taking into account that accurate clinical prognosis for short-term vs. long-term survival for glioma patients is currently nonexistent, this study provides further, independent evidence for the accuracy and the clinical utility of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27429853PMC4937742W2479389431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.