Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429853›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2016

Independent validation of a mathematical genomic model for survival of glioma patients.

Jason B Nikas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Analysis of Glioblastoma Patients with Unexpectedly Long Survival.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason B NikasGenomix Inc. Minneapolis, MN 55364, USA.
Genomix Biotech (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An independent cohort study was conducted to validate a mathematical genomic model for survival of glioma patients that was introduced previously. Of the 102 new subjects that were employed in this study, 40 were long-term survivors (survival ≥ 3 years), and 62 were short-term survivors (survival ≤ 1 year). Utilizing the gene expression of 5 genes as captured by mRNA sequencing of primary tumor tissue, obtained from the initial biopsy during the diagnosis, and prior to the administration of any treatment, the model classified correctly all but three of the 102 subjects. More specifically, of the 62 STS (short-term survivors), 61 were classified correctly (sensitivity = 98.4%); and of the 40 LTS (long-term survivors), 38 were classified correctly (specificity = 95.0%). The 5 gene expression input variables to the model were: FAM120AOS, MXI1, OCIAD2, PCDH15, and PDLIM4. Of the top 29 most significantly differentially expressed genes between STS and LTS subjects, as identified in the original study, all but one were highly significant. Furthermore, with respect to survival, the model - designed to operate at the molecular level (gene expression of tumor cells) - was also able to statistically differentiate between the two subgroups of the STS group, namely, the STS subjects with lower grade glioma and the STS subjects with glioblastoma; whereas variables either at the tissue level or at the organismal level were not able to do so. Based on these results, and taking into account that accurate clinical prognosis for short-term vs. long-term survival for glioma patients is currently nonexistent, this study provides further, independent evidence for the accuracy and the clinical utility of the model.

Indexed as

cancer genomicscomputational biologyFAM120AOSGliomaMXI1OCIAD2PCDH15PDLIM4survival

Identifiers

PMID27429853
PMCPMC4937742
OpenAlexW2479389431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.