Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429780›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Temporal patterns of damage and decay kinetics of DNA retrieved from plant herbarium specimens.

Clemens L Weiß, Verena J Schuenemann, Jane Devos, Gautam Shirsekar, Ella Reiter, Billie A Gould, John R Stinchcombe, Johannes Krause, Hernán A Burbano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ancient wheat DNA: How and what for?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Persistent trade-offs balance competition and colonization across centuries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Challenges and Opportunities behind the Use ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clemens L WeißResearch Group for Ancient Genomics and Evolution, Department of Molecular Biology , Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.
Verena J SchuenemannInstitute of Archaeological Sciences , University of Tübingen , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.
Jane DevosDepartment of Molecular Biology , Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.
Gautam ShirsekarDepartment of Molecular Biology , Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.
Ella ReiterInstitute of Archaeological Sciences , University of Tübingen , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.
Billie A GouldDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology , Toronto, Ontario , Canada M5S.
John R StinchcombeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5S; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5S.
Johannes KrauseInstitute of Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen 72076, Germany; Departments of Paleoanthropology and Archaeogenetics, Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen 72076, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07743, Germany.
Hernán A BurbanoResearch Group for Ancient Genomics and Evolution, Department of Molecular Biology , Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology , Tuebingen 72076 , Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3433-719X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbaria archive a record of changes of worldwide plant biodiversity harbouring millions of specimens that contain DNA suitable for genome sequencing. To profit from this resource, it is fundamental to understand in detail the process of DNA degradation in herbarium specimens. We investigated patterns of DNA fragmentation and nucleotide misincorporation by analysing 86 herbarium samples spanning the last 300 years using Illumina shotgun sequencing. We found an exponential decay relationship between DNA fragmentation and time, and estimated a per nucleotide fragmentation rate of 1.66 × 10(-4) per year, which is six times faster than the rate estimated for ancient bones. Additionally, we found that strand breaks occur specially before purines, and that depurination-driven DNA breakage occurs constantly through time and can to a great extent explain decreasing fragment length over time. Similar to what has been found analysing ancient DNA from bones, we found a strong correlation between the deamination-driven accumulation of cytosine to thymine substitutions and time, which reinforces the importance of substitution patterns to authenticate the ancient/historical nature of DNA fragments. Accurate estimations of DNA degradation through time will allow informed decisions about laboratory and computational procedures to take advantage of the vast collection of worldwide herbarium specimens.

Indexed as

ancient DNADNA damageDNA decayherbarium

Identifiers

PMID27429780
PMCPMC4929915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.