Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429693›Full record

SynthesisThe western journal of emergency medicine2016

Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

Michael A Smyth, Samantha J Brace-McDonnell, Gavin D Perkins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03919851 (Physician Administered Antibiotics in a Prehospital Mobile Emergency Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03919851 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Physician Administered Antibiotics in a Prehospital Mobile Emergency Care Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled117ConditionsSepsisArmsAntibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Telephonic description of sepsis among callers to an emergency dispatch centre in South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2020
    Article
  11. Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Consensus document for sepsis code implementation and development in the Community of Madrid].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A SmythUniversity of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, England.
Samantha J Brace-McDonnellUniversity of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, England.
Gavin D PerkinsUniversity of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, England.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDRF-2012-03-058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis is a common and potentially life-threatening response to an infection. International treatment guidelines for sepsis advocate that treatment be initiated at the earliest possible opportunity. It is not yet clear if very early intervention by ambulance clinicians prior to arrival at hospital leads to improved clinical outcomes among sepsis patients. METHODA: We systematically searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and PubMed up to June 2015. In addition, subject experts were contacted. We adopted the GRADE (grading recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) methodology to conduct the review and follow PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations to report findings.

resultsNine studies met the eligibility criteria - one study was a randomized controlled trial while the remaining studies were observational in nature. There was considerable variation in the methodological approaches adopted and outcome measures reported across the studies. Because of these differences, the studies did not answer a unique research question and meta-analysis was not appropriate. A narrative approach to data synthesis was adopted.

conclusionThere is little robust evidence addressing the impact of prehospital interventions on outcomes in sepsis. That which is available is of low quality and indicates that prehospital interventions have limited impact on outcomes in sepsis beyond improving process outcomes and expediting the patient's passage through the emergency care pathway. Evidence indicating that prehospital antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation improve patient outcomes is currently lacking.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesGuideline AdherenceHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisSepsisTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27429693
PMCPMC4944799
OpenAlexW2469071061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.