Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429491›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2016

Accuracy of point-of-care testing for circulatory cathodic antigen in the detection of schistosome infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anthony Danso-Appiah, Jonathan Minton, Daniel Boamah, Joseph Otchere, Richard H Asmah, Mark Rodgers, Kwabena M Bosompem, Paolo Eusebi, Sake J De Vlas

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Refining Diagnosis ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Detecting twoFrontiers in parasitology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Reproducibility matters: intra- and inter-sample variation of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test in twoPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony Danso-AppiahDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, PO Box LG13, Legon, Ghana .
Jonathan MintonSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland .
Daniel BoamahDepartment of Microbiology, Centre for Plant Medicine Research, Mampong, Ghana .
Joseph OtchereDepartment of Parasitology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana .
Richard H AsmahSchool of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana .
Mark RodgersCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, England .
Kwabena M BosompemDepartment of Parasitology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana .
Paolo EusebiHealth Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia, Italy .
Sake J De VlasDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands .
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the accuracy of point-of-care testing for circulatory cathodic antigen in the diagnosis of schistosome infection.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and other bibliographic databases for studies published until 30 September 2015 that described circulatory cathodic antigen testing compared against one to three Kato-Katz tests per subject - for Schistosoma mansoni - or the filtration of one 10-ml urine sample per subject - for S. haematobium. We extracted the numbers of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives for the antigen testing and performed meta-analyses using a bivariate hierarchical regression model.

findingsTwenty-six studies published between 1994 and 2014 met the inclusion criteria. In the detection of S. mansoni, a single antigen test gave a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.84-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.39-0.71; n = 7) when compared against a single Kato-Katz test. The corresponding values from comparisons with two to three Kato-Katz tests per subject were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.76; n = 14), respectively. There appeared to be no advantage in using three antigen tests per subject instead of one. When compared against the results of urine filtration, antigen testing for S. haematobium showed poor sensitivity and poor specificity. The performance of antigen testing was better in areas of high endemicity than in settings with low endemicity.

conclusionAntigen testing may represent an effective tool for monitoring programmes for the control of S. mansoni.

Indexed as

Antigens, HelminthFecesHumansMass ScreeningPoint-of-Care SystemsSchistosomiasisSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID27429491
PMCPMC4933137
OpenAlexW2311508906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.