Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27429273›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Update and Review on the Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.

Solmaz Niknam Leilabadi, Amie Chen, Stacy Tsai, Vinaya Soundararajan, Howard Silberman, Alex K Wong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An assessment of histological margins and recurrence of melanoma in situ.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Solmaz Niknam LeilabadiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. solmazniknamMD@gmail.com.
Amie ChenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. amie.chen1202@gmail.com.
Stacy TsaiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. TsaiS1@mail.amc.edu.
Vinaya SoundararajanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. vrljs92@yahoo.com.
Howard SilbermanDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 412, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. silberma@usc.edu.
Alex K WongDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St., Suite 415, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA. alex.wong@med.usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical management of malignant melanoma historically called for wide excision of skin and subcutaneous tissue for any given lesion, but has evolved to be rationally-based on pathological staging. Breslow and Clark independently described level and thickness as determinant in prognosis and margin of excision. The American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) in 1988 combined features from each of these histologic classifications, generating a new system, which is continuously updated and improved. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has also combined several large randomized prospective trials to generate current guidelines for melanoma excision as well. In this article, we reviewed: (1) Breslow and Clark classifications, AJCC and NCCN guidelines, the World Health Organization's 1988 study, and the Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial; (2) Experimental use of Mohs surgery for in situ melanoma; and (3) Surgical margins and utility and indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy. Current guidelines for the surgical management of a primary melanoma of the skin is based on Breslow microstaging and call for cutaneous margins of resection of 0.5 cm for MIS, 1.0 cm for melanomas ≤1.0 mm thick, 1-2 cm for melanoma thickness of 1.01-2 mm, 2 cm margins for melanoma thickness of 2.01-4 mm, and 2 cm margins for melanomas >4 mm thick. Although the role of SLNB, CLND, and TLND continue to be studied, current recommendations include SLNB for Stage IB (includes T1b lesions ≤1.0 with the adverse features of ulceration or ≥1 mitoses/mm²) and Stage II melanomas. CLND is recommended when sentinel nodes contain metastatic deposits.

Indexed as

lymphadenectomy in melanomamelanomaprimary cutaneous melanomasentinel lymph node biopsy in melanomasurgical management of melanomasurgical margins of melanoma

Identifiers

PMID27429273
PMCPMC4934469
OpenAlexW2045034908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.