Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27428788›Full record

ArticleHealth care management review

An intraorganizational model for developing and spreading quality improvement innovations.

Katherine C Kellogg, Lindsay A Gainer, Adrienne S Allen, Tatum OʼSullivan, Sara J Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine C KelloggKatherine C. Kellogg, MBA, PhD, is Professor of Work and Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts. E-mail: kkellogg@mit.edu. Lindsay A. Gainer, RN, MSN, is Executive Director of Clinical Services and Innovation, North Shore Physicians Group, Peabody, Massachusetts. Adrienne S. Allen, MD, MPH, is Medical Director of Quality, Safety, and Population Management, North Shore Physicians Group, Peabody, Massachusetts. Tatum O'Sullivan, RN, MHSA, CPHRM, is Director, Ambulatory Risk and Patient Safety, North Shore Physicians Group, Peabody, Massachusetts. Sara J. Singer, MBA, PhD, is Professor of Healthcare Management and Policy, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lindsay A Gainer
Adrienne S Allen
Tatum OʼSullivan
Sara J Singer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent policy reforms encourage quality improvement (QI) innovations in primary care, but practitioners lack clear guidance regarding spread inside organizations. PURPOSE: We designed this study to identify how large organizations can facilitate intraorganizational spread of QI innovations. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We conducted ethnographic observation and interviews in a large, multispecialty, community-based medical group that implemented three QI innovations across 10 primary care sites using a new method for intraorganizational process development and spread. We compared quantitative outcomes achieved through the group's traditional versus new method, created a process model describing the steps in the new method, and identified barriers and facilitators at each step.

findingsThe medical group achieved substantial improvement using its new method of intraorganizational process development and spread of QI innovations: standard work for rooming and depression screening, vaccine error rates and order compliance, and Pap smear error rates. Our model details nine critical steps for successful intraorganizational process development (set priorities, assess the current state, develop the new process, and measure and refine) and spread (develop support, disseminate information, facilitate peer-to-peer training, reinforce, and learn and adapt). Our results highlight the importance of utilizing preexisting organizational structures such as established communication channels, standardized roles, common workflows, formal authority, and performance measurement and feedback systems when developing and spreading QI processes inside an organization. In particular, we detail how formal process advocate positions in each site for each role can facilitate the spread of new processes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Successful intraorganizational spread is possible and sustainable. Developing and spreading new QI processes across sites inside an organization requires creating a shared understanding of the necessary process steps, considering the barriers that may arise at each step, and leveraging preexisting organizational structures to facilitate intraorganizational process development and spread.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalOrganizational InnovationAnthropology, CulturalHumansPrimary Health CareQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID27428788
PMCPMC5590812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.