Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27428546›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical journal of pain2017

External Validation and Modification of a Predictive Model for Acute Postsurgical Pain at Home After Day Surgery.

Björn Stessel, Audrey A A Fiddelers, Marco A Marcus, Sander M J van Kuijk, Elbert A Joosten, Madelon L Peters, Wolfgang F F A Buhre, Hans-Fritz Gramke

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical journal of pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Björn Stessel*Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium Departments of †Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ∥Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment ¶Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University Medical Center+ ‡Network Acute Care Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands §Department of Anesthesia/ICU, Pain & Palliative Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Audrey A A Fiddelers
Marco A Marcus
Sander M J van Kuijk
Elbert A Joosten
Madelon L Peters
Wolfgang F F A Buhre
Hans-Fritz Gramke
Pain and Rehabilitation Medicine · USHamad Medical Corporation · QAJessa Hospital · BEUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2009, Gramke and colleagues have described predictive factors to preoperatively detect those at risk for moderate to severe acute postsurgical pain (APSP) after day surgery. The aim of the present study is to externally validate this initial model and to improve and internally validate a modified version of this model. MATERIALS AND

methodsElective patients scheduled for day surgery were prospectively enrolled from November 2008 to April 2010. Model discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed by visual inspection of the calibration plot. Subsequently, we modified (different assignment of type of surgery, different cutoff for moderate to severe APSP, continuous of dichotomized variables and testing of additional variables) and internally validated this model by standard bootstrapping techniques.

resultsA total of 1118 patients were included. The AUC for the original model was 0.81 in the derivation data set and 0.72 in our validation data set. The model showed poorly calibrated risk predictions. The AUC of the modified model was 0.82 (optimism-corrected AUC=0.78). This modified model showed good calibration.

conclusionsThe original prediction model of Gramke and colleagues performed insufficiently on our cohort of outpatients with respect to discrimination and calibration. Internal validation of a modified model shows promising results. In this model, preoperative pain, patient derived expected pain, and different types of surgery are the strongest predictors of moderate to severe APSP after day surgery.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresModels, TheoreticalAdultArea Under CurveCalibrationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainPrognosisProspective StudiesROC CurveSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27428546
PMCPMC5638419
OpenAlexW2480906506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.