Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27428442›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

Cognitive Enhancement in Infants Associated with Increased Maternal Fruit Intake During Pregnancy: Results from a Birth Cohort Study with Validation in an Animal Model.

Francois V Bolduc, Amanda Lau, Cory S Rosenfelt, Steven Langer, Nan Wang, Lisa Smithson, Diana Lefebvre, R Todd Alexander, Clayton T Dickson, Liang Li and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Annual Research Review: Micronutrients and their role in the treatment of paediatric mental illness.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From Fetus to Eight: the CHILD Cohort Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nutrient restriction causes reversible G2 arrest inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francois V BolducDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: fbolduc@ualberta.ca.
Amanda LauDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada.
Cory S RosenfeltDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada.
Steven LangerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada.
Nan WangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
Lisa SmithsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada.
Diana LefebvreDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada.
R Todd AlexanderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada.
Clayton T DicksonDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada.
Liang LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
Allan B BeckerManitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Padmaja SubbaraoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Canada.
Stuart E TurveyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Jacqueline PeiDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada.
Malcolm R SearsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada.
Piush J MandhaneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: mandhane@ualberta.ca.
CHILD Study InvestigatorsCanadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Study, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAMcMaster University · CAChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-utero nutrition is an under-studied aspect of cognitive development. Fruit has been an important dietary constituent for early hominins and humans. Among 808 eligible CHILD-Edmonton sub-cohort subjects, 688 (85%) had 1-year cognitive outcome data. We found that each maternal daily serving of fruit (sum of fruit plus 100% fruit juice) consumed during pregnancy was associated with a 2.38 point increase in 1-year cognitive development (95% CI 0.39, 4.37; p<0.05). Consistent with this, we found 30% higher learning Performance index (PI) scores in Drosophila offspring from parents who consumed 30% fruit juice supplementation prenatally (PI: 85.7; SE 1.8; p<0.05) compared to the offspring of standard diet parents (PI: 65.0 SE 3.4). Using the Drosophila model, we also show that the cyclic adenylate monophosphate (cAMP) pathway may be a major regulator of this effect, as prenatal fruit associated cognitive enhancement was blocked in Drosophila rutabaga mutants with reduced Ca(2+)-Calmodulin-dependent adenylyl cyclase. Moreover, gestation is a critical time for this effect as postnatal fruit intake did not enhance cognitive performance in either humans or Drosophila. Our study supports increased fruit consumption during pregnancy with significant increases in infant cognitive performance. Validation in Drosophila helps control for potential participant bias or unmeasured confounders.

Indexed as

CognitionFeeding BehaviorFruitMaternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultAnimalsCohort StudiesCyclic AMPDrosophilaFemaleFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumansInfantLearningMemoryCyclic AMPBirth cohortDrosophila learningFruitGestational diet

Identifiers

PMID27428442
PMCPMC4919537
OpenAlexW2339699192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.