Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27428432›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8+ T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication.

Victoria E Walker-Sperling, Christopher W Pohlmeyer, Patrick M Tarwater, Joel N Blankson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Traditional Medicine Extracts ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HIV-1 latency reversal agent boosting is not limited by opioid use.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria E Walker-SperlingCenter for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.
Christopher W PohlmeyerCenter for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA.
Patrick M TarwaterDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.
Joel N BlanksonCenter for AIDS Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: jblanks@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

BIOCHEMISTRY, CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY PROGRAMT32GM007445 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2021
$24.1M
CELLULAR &MOLECULAR MECH OF INFLAMMATORY REACTIONST32AI007247 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Joel L Pomerantz · 1985 to 2026
$10.2M
A mouse viral outgrowth assay for the detection of residual HIV-1 reservoirsR01AI120024 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BLANKSON, JOEL N · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI120024NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shock and kill strategies involving the use of small molecules to induce viral transcription in resting CD4+ T cells (shock) followed by immune mediated clearance of the reactivated cells (kill), have been proposed as a method of eliminating latently infected CD4+ T cells. The combination of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor romidepsin and protein kinase C (PKC) agonist bryostatin-1 is very effective at reversing latency in vitro. However, we found that primary HIV-1 specific CD8+ T cells were not able to eliminate autologous resting CD4+ T cells that had been reactivated with these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that the drugs affected primary CD8+ T cell function and found that both agents had inhibitory effects on the suppressive capacity of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells from patients who control viral replication without antiretroviral therapy (elite suppressors/controllers). The inhibitory effect was additive and multi-factorial in nature. These inhibitory effects were not seen with prostratin, another PKC agonist, either alone or in combination with JQ1, a bromodomain-containing protein 4 inhibitor. Our results suggest that because of their adverse effects on primary CD8+ T cells, some LRAs may cause immune-suppression and therefore should be used with caution in shock and kill strategies.

Indexed as

Virus LatencyAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveBiomarkersBryostatinsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesDepsipeptidesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHLA-A AntigensHLA-B AntigensHumansImmunomodulationBiomarkersbryostatin 1BryostatinsCytokinesDepsipeptidesHLA-A AntigensHLA-B AntigensReceptors, Antigen, T-CellromidepsinCD8+ T cellsElite controllersElite suppressorsEradicationHIV-1Latency reversal agents

Identifiers

PMID27428432
PMCPMC4919475
OpenAlexW2339197934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.