Observational studyInternational journal of cardiology2016
Warfarin treatment and risk of myocardial infarction - A cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation treated in primary health care.
Observational study in International journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low incidence of thromboembolism with Fiix-monitored warfarin compared to conventional warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025Article
- The association between gout and cardiovascular disease in patients with atrial fibrillation.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo study the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated in primary health care with warfarin or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin).
methodsThe study population included subjects (n=12,283) 45years or older diagnosed with AF who were treated in 75 primary care centres in Sweden between 2001 and 2007. MI was defined as a hospital stay for MI during 2001 through 2010 registered in the Swedish Patient Register. Associations between warfarin or ASA treatment and incident MI were explored using Cox regression analysis, by estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Adjustment was made for age, socio-economic factors and cardio-vascular co-morbidity.
resultsPersistent treatment ("per protocol" treatment) with warfarin alone was present among 32.4% of women and 37.4% of men, and with ASA alone among 30.0% of women and 28.1% of men. The fully adjusted HRs for MI, compared to those with no antithrombotic treatment, with warfarin treatment for women were 0.26 (95% CI 0.16-0.41) and for men 0.28 (95% CI 0.20-0.39); and the corresponding HRs for those treated with ASA were for women 0.57 (95% CI 0.37-0.87), and for men 0.44 95% CI (0.31-0.63). The fully adjusted HR for MI when comparing patients with warfarin treatment to those with ASA treatment was for women 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.80), and for men 0.58 (95% CI 0.38-0.89).
conclusionsWarfarin seems to prevent MI among AF patients in a primary healthcare setting, which emphasizes the importance of persistent anticoagulant treatment in those patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.