ArticleMedicine2016
Predictors and long-term clinical outcomes of newly developed atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Atrial High-Rate Episode Duration Thresholds and Thromboembolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Clinical Questions with Complex Solutions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- The impact of the right heart cavities echocardiographic features on atrial-high rate episodes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Establishment and Verification of a Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Dual-Chamber Pacemaker Implantation.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023Article
- Risk Factors and Prognostic Implications of New-Onset Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Hospitalized with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Role of atrial high-rate episodes in stratifying thromboembolic risk: a multiple cut-off diagnostic meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence predicts clinically relevant atrial high-rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Novel Predictor for New-Onset Atrial High-Rate Episode in Patients With a Dual-Chamber Pacemaker.Circulation reports · 2021Article
- Atrial High-Rate Event Incidence and Predictors in Patients With Permanent Pacemaker Implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Subclinical and Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: Pondering the Knowledge Gap: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate predictors and long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in patients without history of AF.
methodsFrom May 1994 to April 2014, 1825 patients with CIED were enrolled in a retrospective, single-center registry. A total of 880 patients from the registry without prior documented AF history were included in the final analysis and were placed into either non-detected AF (NDAF) group or CIED-detected AF group according to development of AF over a follow-up period of 7 years. AF development was defined as any paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial rate ≥ 180 beats/min) lasting at least 5 minutes according to CIED records.
resultsOverall, 122 (13.8%) of the 880 patients experienced new development of AF during follow-up period. According to multivariate analysis, the independent predictors for development of AF were prior heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-3.85; P < 0.001), prior sinus node dysfunction (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.62-3.55; P < 0.001), and left atrium volume index of 38.5 mL/m or more (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.30; P = 0.005). In CDAF group, the risk of heart failure readmission (adjusted HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.99-7.22; P < 0.001) and stroke readmission (adjusted HR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.58-17.97; P = 0.007) was higher than in nondetected AF group.
conclusionIn patients with CIED, prior history of heart failure, sinus node dysfunction, and LA volume index ≥38.5 mL/m were independent predictors of new AF cases. Newly developed AF was significantly associated with increased risk of HF and stroke readmission, according to long-term follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.