ArticleMedicine2016
Adherence to treatment of chronic hepatitis C: from interferon containing regimens to interferon and ribavirin free regimens.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03894696 (Frequency of Anxiety and Depression in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Recieving Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents.), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Frequency of Anxiety and Depression in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Recieving Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- A precision randomized trial to evaluate the impact of tailored hepatitis C treatment adherence support on HCV treatment outcomes among people who inject drugs in India: design and baseline characteristics of the STOP-C trial.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Trial
- Impact of extended release naltrexone on health-related quality of life in individuals with legal involvement and opioid use disorders.Substance abuse · 2021Trial
- Ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir +/- ribavirin in real world hepatitis C patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Trial
- Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in treatment-naïve patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Trial
- Overcoming barriers to patient adherence: the case for developing innovative drug delivery systems.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2023Review
- HCV infection characteristics, treatment uptake and outcomes in patient with diabetes mellitus.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Direct-acting antiviral retreatment patterns for hepatitis C.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Combination of Novel Therapies for HDV.Viruses · 2022Review
- Impact of hepatitis C treatment on long-term outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a United States Safety Net Collaborative Study.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2021Article
- Evolution of Hepatitis C Virus Treatment During the Era of Sofosbuvir-Based Therapies: A Real-World Experience in France.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Applicability of a new specialty pharmacy-reported measure describing completion of therapy for hepatitis C.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Article
- Strategic treatment optimization for HCV (STOPHCV1): a randomised controlled trial of ultrashort duration therapy for chronic hepatitis C.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Medication Non-adherence in a Prospective, Multi-center Cohort Treated with Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Observational
- Adherence to pan-genotypic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and efficacy in HCV-infected patients: A pooled analysis of clinical trials.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2020Article
- Wirelessly Observed Therapy to Optimize Adherence and Target Interventions for Oral Hepatitis C Treatment: Observational Pilot Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Predicting Treatment Failure for Initiators of Hepatitis C Virus Treatment in the era of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Transplantation: Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Immunosuppression Regimen.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020Review
- HCV compliance and treatment success rates are higher with DAAs in structured HCV clinics compared to general hepatology clinics.Medicine · 2019Article
- Epidemiology and management of hepatitis C virus infections in immigrant populations.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2019Review
- Real-world health care utilization in treatment of HCV: Results from the Canadian SIMPLE observational trial.Canadian liver journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients' experience during treatment may affect treatment adherence. Our aim was to assess the impact of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on adherence to different anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens.Clinical, demographic, and PRO data (short form-36 [SF-36], chronic liver disease questionnaire-hepatitis C version [CLDQ-HCV], functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue [FACIT-F], work productivity and activity impairment: specific health problem [WPAI:SHP]) from 13 multinational clinical trials of anti-HCV treatment were available. Treatment adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed doses taken.Included were 4825 HCV patients. Regimens were grouped into: interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing (±sofosbuvir [SOF]), interferon-free RBV-containing (RBV + SOF ± ledipasvir [LDV]), and interferon-free RBV-free (LDV/SOF). The adherence to these regimens were 77.6%, 84.3%, and 96.2%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nonadherent patients were more likely to be unemployed and to have a greater PRO impairment at baseline (up to -5.3% lower PRO scores, P < 0.0001). During treatment with interferon- or RBV-based regimens, nonadherent patients experienced lower PROs and had larger decrements from their baseline PRO scores. In contrast, there were no significant declines in PRO scores (all P > 0.05) for the small number of patients who were nonadherent to LDV/SOF. In multivariate analysis, being treatment-naive, longer treatment duration, and receiving an interferon- or RBV-containing regimen were associated with a lower likelihood of adherence (all P < 0.003). Better baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were associated with a higher likelihood of adherence to interferon and RBV.The use of interferon and/or RBV, longer duration of treatment, and lower baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were linked to a decreased likelihood of being adherent to interferon + RBV-containing or interferon-free RBV-containing antiviral regimens. Interferon- and RBV-free regimens were associated with excellent adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.