SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016
Speech therapy for children with dysarthria acquired before three years of age.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PROMPT to Improve Speech Motor Abilities in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Communication in Children With or Without Biomedical Conditions: Speech and Language Profile, Related Outcomes and Articulation Treatment With Ultrasound
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Treatment-Related Side Effects and Toxicities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Internet delivery of intensive speech and language therapy for children with cerebral palsy: a pilot randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- Review
- Can We Trust Our Ears? How Accurate and Reliable Are Speech-Language Pathologists' Estimates of Children's Speech Intelligibility?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Oral functions in adult persons with spinal muscular atrophy compared to a healthy control group: a prospective cross-sectional study with a multimodal approach.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Expanding the phenotype of Kleefstra syndrome: speech, language and cognition in 103 individuals.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Neuromuscular adaptations of swallowing and speech in unilateral cerebral palsy: shared and distinctive traits.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Sentence Length Effects on Intelligibility in Two Groups of Older Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Article
- PROMPT to improve speech motor abilities in children with cerebral palsy: a wait-list control group trial protocol.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Social motivation a relative strength in DYRK1A syndrome on a background of significant speech and language impairments.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Evidence and gap map of studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions for people with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries.Campbell systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Effects of Rate Manipulation on Intelligibility in Children With Cerebral Palsy.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Construct Validity of the Viking Speech Scale.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2019Article
- Early speech development in Koolen de Vries syndrome limited by oral praxis and hypotonia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- Dysarthria and broader motor speech deficits in Dravet syndrome.Neurology · 2017Article
- Economic Evaluations of Speech and Language Therapy Interventions: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren with motor impairments often have the motor speech disorder dysarthria, a condition which effects the tone, strength and co-ordination of any or all of the muscles used for speech. Resulting speech difficulties can range from mild, with slightly slurred articulation and breathy voice, to profound, with an inability to produce any recognisable words. Children with dysarthria are often prescribed communication aids to supplement their natural forms of communication. However, there is variation in practice regarding the provision of therapy focusing on voice and speech production. Descriptive studies have suggested that therapy may improve speech, but its effectiveness has not been evaluated.
objectivesTo assess whether any speech and language therapy intervention aimed at improving the speech of children with dysarthria is more effective in increasing children's speech intelligibility or communicative participation than no intervention at all , and to compare the efficacy of individual types of speech language therapy in improving the speech intelligibility or communicative participation of children with dysarthria. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015 , Issue 7 ), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL , LLBA, ERIC, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, UK National Research Register and Dissertation Abstracts up to July 2015, handsearched relevant journals published between 1980 and July 2015, and searched proceedings of relevant conferences between 1996 to 2015. We placed no restrictions on the language or setting of the studies. A previous version of this review considered studies published up to April 2009. In this update we searched for studies published from April 2009 to July 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials and studies using quasi-experimental designs in which children were allocated to groups using non-random methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author (LP) conducted searches of all databases, journals and conference reports. All searches included a reliability check in which a second review author independently checked a random sample comprising 15% of all identified reports. We planned that two review authors would independently assess the quality and extract data from eligible studies. MAIN
resultsNo randomised controlled trials or group studies were identified. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review found no evidence from randomised trials of the effectiveness of speech and language therapy interventions to improve the speech of children with early acquired dysarthria. Rigorous, fully powered randomised controlled trials are needed to investigate if the positive changes in children's speech observed in phase I and phase II studies are generalisable to the population of children with early acquired dysarthria served by speech and language therapy services. Research should examine change in children's speech production and intelligibility. It must also investigate children's participation in social and educational activities, and their quality of life, as well as the cost and acceptability of interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.