ArticlePloS one2016
Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creative pedagogic methods for self-guided embodied thinking and learning about animal research.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- A good life? A good death? Reconciling care and harm in animal research.Social & cultural geography · 2023Article
- When 'cultures of care' meet: entanglements and accountabilities at the intersection of animal research and patient involvement in the UK.Social & cultural geography · 2023Article
- Advancing the 3Rs: innovation, implementation, ethics and society.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Model Organisms Unbound.Journal of the history of biology · 2022Article
- Critiquing imaginaries of 'the public' in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project.Studies in history and philosophy of science · 2022Article
- Article
- Multiphoton intravital microscopy of rodents.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Locating the 'culture wars' in laboratory animal research: national constitutions and global competition.Studies in history and philosophy of science · 2021Article
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare.Medical humanities · 2020Article
- Atlantic Horseshoe Crabs and Endotoxin Testing: Perspectives on Alternatives, sustainable Methods, and the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement).Frontiers in Marine Science · 2020Article
- Recalibrating Veterinary Medicine through Animal Welfare Science and Ethics for the 2020s.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Animals, veterinarians and the sociology of diagnosis.Sociology of health & illness · 2020Review
- Attitudes toward animals, and how species and purpose affect animal research justifiability, among undergraduate students and faculty.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- "But It's Just a Fish": Understanding the Challenges of Applying the 3Rs in Laboratory Aquariums in the UK.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Animal Research, Accountability, Openness and Public Engagement: Report from an International Expert Forum.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Attuning to laboratory animals and telling stories: Learning animal geography research skills from animal technologists.Environment and planning. D, Society & space · 2019Article
- Assessing undergraduate student and faculty views on animal research: What do they know, whom do they trust, and how much do they care?PloS one · 2019Article
- A Hierarchy of Deaths: Stem Cells, Animals and Humans Understood by Developmental Biologists.Science as culture · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the '3Rs'), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, 'cultures of care', harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.