Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27428016›Full record

ArticleBlood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis2017

Validation of STA-Liatest D-Di assay for exclusion of pulmonary embolism according to the latest Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute/Food and Drug Administration guideline. Results of a multicenter management study.

Gilles Pernod, Haifeng Wu, Emmanuel de Maistre, John Lazarchick, Jeannine Kassis, Carlos Aguilar, Pascual M Vera, Gualtiero Palareti, Armando D'Angelo, DiET Study Group (Jeffrey Caterino, Fabienne Dutrillaux, Gary Headden, Colin Kaide, Maxime Maignan, Raphaël Marlu, Anais Richard, Cindy Tissier)

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Raising the D-dimer bar: a narrative review of the age-adjusted D-dimer threshold.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilles PernodaDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France bPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA cHematology Laboratory, University Hospital, Dijon, France dPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA eDepartment of Haematology, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada fDepartment of Haematology, Santa Barbara General Hospital, Soria gLaboratio de Coagulación, Centro Sanitario Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain hDepartment of Angiology and Blood Coagulation 'Marino Golinelli', Bologna University Hospital Corporation, Policlinica S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna iCoagulation Service and Thrombosis Research Unit, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Haifeng Wu
Emmanuel de Maistre
John Lazarchick
Jeannine Kassis
Carlos Aguilar
Pascual M Vera
Gualtiero Palareti
Armando D'Angelo
DiET Study Group (Jeffrey Caterino, Fabienne Dutrillaux, Gary Headden, Colin Kaide, Maxime Maignan, Raphaël Marlu, Anais Richard, Cindy Tissier)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCreative Commons · USUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Combined clinical pretest probability (PTP) and D-dimer testing have great diagnostic value for pulmonary embolism exclusion. To harmonize performance levels of D-dimer assays available on the market, the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) has published a guideline, endorsed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Such guideline specifies the ideal D-dimer assay characteristic and target population. This study was conducted following the CLSI guideline to upgrade the assay-intended use and obtain FDA clearance of STA-Liatest D-Di assay for pulmonary embolism exclusion in patient with low/moderate PTP. This was an international, multicenter, prospective nonrandomized, noninterventional clinical outcome management study conducted in a standard of care setting. D-dimer assay was performed in consecutive, ambulatory outpatients suspected of pulmonary embolism, with low/moderate PTP, and without medical conditions or in clinical settings known to alter default D-dimer values regardless of the presence of thrombosis using a threshold of 0.5 μg/ml (fibrinogen equivalent units) for venous thromboembolism exclusion. Results were used to determine test performance. Of 1141 patients who underwent D-dimer testing, 1060 had valid results and completed study as planned. STA-Liatest D-Di assay performance has exceeded the CLSI/FDA guidance requirements, with a sensitivity of 97.6% (95% confidence interval: 91.7-99.7%) and a negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% confidence interval: 99.0-100%). STA-Liatest D-Di assay has an excellent performance when used in combination with a PTP score in relevant patients and has the potential to minimize the economic healthcare burden avoiding unnecessary and expensive imaging tests.

Indexed as

Biological AssayFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary EmbolismUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID27428016
PMCPMC5407630
OpenAlexW2498545565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.