Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27427867›Full record

Trial reportRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2016

Perineal Pain Management with Cryotherapy after Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ítalo Morais, Andréa Lemos, Leila Katz, Lorena Fernandes Rosendo de Melo, Mariano Maia Maciel, Melania Maria Ramos de Amorim

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ítalo MoraisPost-Graduate Program in Maternal-Infant Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP); Department of Physical Therapy, Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau (UNINASSAU), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Andréa LemosPost-Graduate Program in Maternal-Infant Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Leila KatzPost-Graduate Program in Maternal-Infant Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Lorena Fernandes Rosendo de MeloCientific Initiation Program, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP). Undergraduate course in Medicine, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Mariano Maia MacielCientific Initiation Program, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP). Undergraduate course in Medicine, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Melania Maria Ramos de AmorimPost-Graduate Program in Maternal-Infant Health, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Systematic reviews that evaluate the perineal cryotherapy to reduce pain in the vaginal postpartum are inconclusive. Purpose To evaluate clinical effectiveness of cryotherapy in the management of humanized postpartum perineal pain and vaginal edema. Methods A double-bind randomized controlled clinical trial (UTN number: U1111-1131-8433) was conducted in a hospital in Northeastern, Brazil. Women were included following humanized childbirth. All had vaginal deliveries of a single, full-term pregnancy with cephalic presentation. Exclusion criteria included previous perineal lesion, episiotomy during the current delivery, instrumental delivery, uterine curettage and postpartum hemorrhage. In the experimental group, an ice pack was applied six times on the perineum for 20 minutes, reducing the temperature between 10 and 15 ° C, then 60 minutes without exposure to cold. In the non-cryotherapy, a water bag unable to reduce the temperature to this extent was used, compliance with the same application protocol of the first group. Perineal temperature was monitored at zero, 10 and 20 minutes for application in both groups. Evaluations were made immediately before and after the applications and 24 hours after delivery spontaneous, to determine the association between variables. Results A total of 80 women were included in the study, 40 in each group. There was no significant difference in scores of perineal pain and edema between the groups with or without cryotherapy until 24 hours after childbirth. There was no difference between groups when accomplished repeated measures analysis over the 24 hours after delivery, considering the median perineal pain (p = 0.3) and edema (p = 0.9). Perineal cryotherapy did not influence the amount of analgesics used (p = 0.07) and no adverse effect was registered. Conclusion The use of cryotherapy following normal vaginal delivery within the concept of humanized minimally interventionist childbirth had no effect on perineal pain and edema, since it was already substantially lower, nor the need for pain medicaments.

Indexed as

CryotherapyDelivery, ObstetricPerineumAdolescentAdultChildDouble-Blind MethodEdemaFemaleHumansPain ManagementPuerperal DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27427867
PMCPMC10374237
OpenAlexW2504237938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.