Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27426643›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2016

Public knowledge, attitudes, social distance and reported contact regarding people with mental illness 2009-2015.

C Henderson, E Robinson, S Evans-Lacko, E Corker, I Rebollo-Mesa, D Rose, G Thornicroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Changes in Attitudes toward Mental Illness in Healthcare Professionals and Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C HendersonHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
E RobinsonBiostatistics Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
S Evans-LackoHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
E CorkerHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
I Rebollo-MesaBiostatistics Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
D RoseHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.
G ThornicroftHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether public knowledge, attitudes, desire for social distance and reported contact in relation to people with mental health problems have improved in England during the Time to Change (TTC) programme to reduce stigma and discrimination 2009-2015.

methodsUsing data from an annual face-to-face survey of a nationally representative sample of adults, we analysed longitudinal trends in the outcomes with regression modelling using standardised scores of the measures overall and by age and gender subgroups.

resultsThere were improvements in all outcomes. The improvement for knowledge was 0.17 standard deviation units in 2015 compared to 2009 (95% CI 0.10, 0.23); for attitudes 0.20 standard deviation units (95% CI 0.14, 0.27) and for social distance 0.17 standard deviation units (95% CI 0.11, 0.24). Survey year for 2015 vs. 2009 was associated with a higher likelihood of reported contact (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13, 1.53). Statistically significant interactions between year and age suggest the campaign had more impact on the attitudes of the target age group (25-45) than those aged over 65 or under 25. Women's reported contact with people with mental health problems increased more than did men's.

conclusionThe results provide support for the effectiveness of TTC.

Indexed as

Public OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychological DistanceSex CharacteristicsSocial StigmaYoung Adultattitudediscriminationpublic opinionsocial distancesocial stigma

Identifiers

PMID27426643
PMCPMC6680221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.