Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27426642›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2016

Qualitative analysis of mental health service users' reported experiences of discrimination.

S Hamilton, V Pinfold, J Cotney, L Couperthwaite, J Matthews, K Barret, S Warren, E Corker, D Rose, G Thornicroft and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Everyday Discrimination and Its Predictors in the MASALA Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Stigma Toward Severe Mental Illness Among Healthcare Students: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the stigma against people with mental illness in Bangladesh.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S HamiltonThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
V PinfoldThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
J CotneyThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
L CouperthwaiteThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
J MatthewsThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
K BarretThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
S WarrenThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
E CorkerHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
D RoseHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
G ThornicroftHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
C HendersonHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo better understand mental health service users' experiences of stigma and discrimination in different settings.

methodAn annual telephone survey of people with a mental health diagnosis conducted to evaluate the Time to Change antistigma campaign in England. Of 985 people who participated in 2013, 84 took part in a qualitative interview which was audio recorded. Of these, 50 interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed to explore accounts of discrimination. We analysed common types of behaviour; motivations ascribed to the discriminators; expectations of what fair treatment would have been; and the impact of discrimination on participants.

resultsDiscrimination was most common in five contexts: welfare benefits, mental health care, physical health care, family and friends. Participants often found it hard to assess whether a behaviour was discriminatory or not. Lack of support, whether by public services or by friends and family, was often experienced as discrimination, reflecting an expectation that positive behaviours and reasonable adjustments should be offered in response to mental health needs.

conclusionThe impact of discrimination across different settings was often perceived by participants as aggravating their mental health, and there is thus a need to treat discrimination as a health issue, not just a social justice issue.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesQualitative ResearchSocial DiscriminationSocial StigmaYoung Adultmental healthsocial stigmasurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27426642
PMCPMC6680261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.