Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27426514›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Glutamatergic Monopolar Interneurons Provide a Novel Pathway of Excitation in the Mouse Retina.

Luca Della Santina, Sidney P Kuo, Takeshi Yoshimatsu, Haruhisa Okawa, Sachihiro C Suzuki, Mrinalini Hoon, Kotaro Tsuboyama, Fred Rieke, Rachel O L Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Approaching a connectome of the human foveal retina.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inducible CreEReNeuro · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Connectome of a human foveal retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Inducible CreERbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolutionary and developmental specialization of foveal cell types in the marmoset.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luca Della SantinaDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA; Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy.
Sidney P KuoDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA.
Takeshi YoshimatsuDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA.
Haruhisa OkawaDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA.
Sachihiro C SuzukiDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA.
Mrinalini HoonDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA.
Kotaro TsuboyamaDepartment of Cellular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Fred RiekeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA.
Rachel O L WongDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7420, USA. Electronic address: wongr2@uw.edu.

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Circuit Assembly in the Vertebrate Retina-SupplementR01EY017101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WONG, RACHEL O · 2006 to 2020
$4.7M
BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF SINGLE PHOTON DETECTIONR01EY011850 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 1997 to 2015
$3.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011850NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the CNS are distinguished by several features, including morphology, transmitter content, and synapse architecture [1]. Such distinctions are exemplified in the vertebrate retina. Retinal bipolar cells are polarized glutamatergic neurons receiving direct photoreceptor input, whereas amacrine cells are usually monopolar inhibitory interneurons with synapses almost exclusively in the inner retina [2]. Bipolar but not amacrine cell synapses have presynaptic ribbon-like structures at their transmitter release sites. We identified a monopolar interneuron in the mouse retina that resembles amacrine cells morphologically but is glutamatergic and, unexpectedly, makes ribbon synapses. These glutamatergic monopolar interneurons (GluMIs) do not receive direct photoreceptor input, and their light responses are strongly shaped by both ON and OFF pathway-derived inhibitory input. GluMIs contact and make almost as many synapses as type 2 OFF bipolar cells onto OFF-sustained A-type (AOFF-S) retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). However, GluMIs and type 2 OFF bipolar cells possess functionally distinct light-driven responses and may therefore mediate separate components of the excitatory synaptic input to AOFF-S RGCs. The identification of GluMIs thus unveils a novel cellular component of excitatory circuits in the vertebrate retina, underscoring the complexity in defining cell types even in this well-characterized region of the CNS.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsFemaleGABAergic NeuronsGlutamic AcidMaleMiceMice, TransgenicRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Ganglion CellsGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27426514
PMCPMC4980212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.