Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27426040›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2016

Reciprocal Regulation between Bifunctional miR-9/9(∗) and its Transcriptional Modulator Notch in Human Neural Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Differentiation.

Beate Roese-Koerner, Laura Stappert, Thomas Berger, Nils Christian Braun, Monika Veltel, Johannes Jungverdorben, Bernd O Evert, Michael Peitz, Lodovica Borghese, Oliver Brüstle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. MicroRNA Signature in Human Normal and Tumoral Neural Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. MicroRNAs in brain development and cerebrovascular pathophysiology.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beate Roese-KoernerInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Laura StappertInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Thomas BergerInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nils Christian BraunInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Monika VeltelInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Johannes JungverdorbenInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Bernd O EvertDepartment of Neurology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Michael PeitzInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Lodovica BorgheseInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Oliver BrüstleInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, LIFE & BRAIN Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 53127 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: brustle@uni-bonn.de.
Life & Brain (Germany) · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tight regulation of the balance between self-renewal and differentiation of neural stem cells is crucial to assure proper neural development. In this context, Notch signaling is a well-known promoter of stemness. In contrast, the bifunctional brain-enriched microRNA miR-9/9(∗) has been implicated in promoting neuronal differentiation. Therefore, we set out to explore the role of both regulators in human neural stem cells. We found that miR-9/9(∗) decreases Notch activity by targeting NOTCH2 and HES1, resulting in an enhanced differentiation. Vice versa, expression levels of miR-9/9(∗) depend on the activation status of Notch signaling. While Notch inhibits differentiation of neural stem cells, it also induces miR-9/9(∗) via recruitment of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD)/RBPj transcriptional complex to the miR-9/9(∗)_2 genomic locus. Thus, our data reveal a mutual interaction between bifunctional miR-9/9(∗) and the Notch signaling cascade, calibrating the delicate balance between self-renewal and differentiation of human neural stem cells.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesCell DifferentiationCell Self RenewalGene Expression RegulationGenetic LociHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansMicroRNAsMultiprotein ComplexesNeural Stem CellsProtein BindingReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesMicroRNAsMIRN92 microRNA, humanMultiprotein ComplexesReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID27426040
PMCPMC4982985
OpenAlexW2468119687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.