Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27425616›Full record

ArticleCell reports2016

Cell Type-Specific Differences in Spike Timing and Spike Shape in the Rat Parasubiculum and Superficial Medial Entorhinal Cortex.

Christian Laut Ebbesen, Eric Torsten Reifenstein, Qiusong Tang, Andrea Burgalossi, Saikat Ray, Susanne Schreiber, Richard Kempter, Michael Brecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sharp Tuning of Head Direction and Angular Head Velocity Cells in the Somatosensory Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Spike Afterpotentials Shape theThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian Laut EbbesenBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Eric Torsten ReifensteinBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Institute for Theoretical Biology and Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Qiusong TangBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Andrea BurgalossiWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Otfried-Müller-Strass 25, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Saikat RayBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Susanne SchreiberBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Institute for Theoretical Biology and Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Richard KempterBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany; Institute for Theoretical Biology and Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Michael BrechtBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 6, 10115 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: michael.brecht@bccn-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) and the adjacent parasubiculum are known for their elaborate spatial discharges (grid cells, border cells, etc.) and the precessing of spikes relative to the local field potential. We know little, however, about how spatio-temporal firing patterns map onto cell types. We find that cell type is a major determinant of spatio-temporal discharge properties. Parasubicular neurons and MEC layer 2 (L2) pyramids have shorter spikes, discharge spikes in bursts, and are theta-modulated (rhythmic, locking, skipping), but spikes phase-precess only weakly. MEC L2 stellates and layer 3 (L3) neurons have longer spikes, do not discharge in bursts, and are weakly theta-modulated (non-rhythmic, weakly locking, rarely skipping), but spikes steeply phase-precess. The similarities between MEC L3 neurons and MEC L2 stellates on one hand and parasubicular neurons and MEC L2 pyramids on the other hand suggest two distinct streams of temporal coding in the parahippocampal cortex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsEntorhinal CortexHippocampusNeuronsRatsTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID27425616
PMCPMC4967475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.