Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27425384›Full record

ArticleVision research2016

Dissecting the influence of the collinear and flanking bars in White's effect.

Barbara Blakeslee, Ganesh Padmanabhan, Mark E McCourt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara BlakesleeCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5075, United States. Electronic address: barbara.blakeslee@ndsu.edu.
Ganesh PadmanabhanCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5075, United States.
Mark E McCourtCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5075, United States.
North Dakota State University · US

Funding

Center for Visual and Cognitive NeuroscienceP20GM103505 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2012 to 2014
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In White's effect equiluminant test patches placed on the black and white bars of a square-wave grating appear different in brightness. The illusion has generated intense interest because the direction of the brightness effect does not correlate with the amount of black or white border in contact with the test patch, or in its general vicinity. Therefore, unlike brightness induction effects such as simultaneous contrast, White's effect is not consistent with explanations based on contrast or assimilation that depend solely on the relative amounts of black and white surrounding the test patches. We independently manipulated the luminance of the collinear and flanking bars to investigate their influence on test patch matching luminance (brightness). The inducing grating was a 0.5c/d square-wave and test patches measured 1.0° in width and either 0.5° or 3.0° in height. Test patches measuring 0.5° in height had more extensive contact with the collinear bars and test patches measuring 3.0° in height had more extensive contact with the flanking bars. The luminance of the collinear (or flanking) bars assumed twenty values from 3.2 to 124.8cd/m(2), while the luminance of the flanking (or collinear) bars remained white (124.8cd/m(2)) or black (3.2cd/m(2)). Under these conditions the influence of the collinear and flanking bars was found to be purely in the direction of contrast. The effect was dominated by contrast from the collinear bars (which results in White's effect), however, the influence of the flanking bars was also in the contrast direction. The data elucidate the luminance relationships between the collinear and flanking bars which produce the behavior associated with White's effect as well as that associated with "the inverted White effect" which is akin to simultaneous contrast.

Indexed as

Optical IllusionsAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansLightMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationAssimilation mechanismContrast mechanismInverted White effectSimultaneous contrastWhite’s effect

Identifiers

PMID27425384
PMCPMC5035611
OpenAlexW2503999719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.