Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27424083›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2016

Anti-PEG antibodies alter the mobility and biodistribution of densely PEGylated nanoparticles in mucus.

Christine E Henry, Ying-Ying Wang, Qi Yang, Thuy Hoang, Sumon Chattopadhyay, Timothy Hoen, Laura M Ensign, Kenetta L Nunn, Holly Schroeder, Justin McCallen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vaginally-delivered fast-dissolving antibody tablets (FDAT) for on-demand non-hormonal contraception and multi-purpose protection.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine E HenryUNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Ying-Ying WangDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Qi YangDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Thuy HoangDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Sumon ChattopadhyayCenter for Nanomedicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Timothy HoenDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Laura M EnsignCenter for Nanomedicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Kenetta L NunnUNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Holly SchroederDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Justin McCallenDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Thomas MoenchReProtect, Inc., 703 Stags Head Road, Baltimore, MD 21286, USA.
Richard ConeDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Steve R RofflerInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Section 2, Academia Road, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Samuel K LaiDivision of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; UNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: lai@unc.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWJohns Hopkins Medicine · USReProtect (United States) · USUNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Vaginal mAB Delivery SystemsU19AI096398 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ANDERSON, DEBORAH J, MOENCH, THOMAS RAY · 2011 to 2016
$15.0M
UNC PREP in the Biomedical Sciences - Administrative SupplementR25GM089569 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBINSON, DONITA L, RODRIGUEZ-ROMAGUERA, JOSE · 2010 to 2024
$5.6M
Prevalence and characteristics of anti-PEG antibodies in humansR21EB017938 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAI, SAMUEL · 2014 to 2015
$413k
Trapping HIV in mucus with IgG antibodiesR21AI093242 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAI, SAMUEL · 2011 to 2012
$403k
Mechanisms regulating episodic breaches of protective vaginal microbiome by BVF32AI102535 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, YING-YING · 2012 to 2013
$101k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI102535NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI093242NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096398NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB017938NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM089569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAntibodies that specifically bind polyethylene glycol (PEG) can lead to rapid elimination of PEGylated therapeutics from the systemic circulation. We have recently shown that virus-binding IgG can immobilize viruses in mucus via multiple low-affinity crosslinks between IgG and mucins. However, it remains unclear whether anti-PEG antibodies in mucus may also alter the penetration and consequently biodistribution of PEGylated nanoparticles delivered to mucosal surfaces. We found that both anti-PEG IgG and IgM can readily bind nanoparticles that were densely coated with PEG polymer to minimize adhesive interactions with mucus constituents. Addition of anti-PEG IgG and IgM into mouse cervicovaginal mucus resulted in extensive trapping of mucus-penetrating PEGylated nanoparticles, with the fraction of mobile particles reduced from over 95% to only 34% and 7% with anti-PEG IgG and IgM, respectively. Surprisingly, we did not observe significant agglutination induced by either antibody, suggesting that particle immobilization is caused by adhesive crosslinks between mucin fibers and IgG or IgM bound to individual nanoparticles. Importantly, addition of corresponding control antibodies did not slow the PEGylated nanoparticles, confirming anti-PEG antibodies specifically bound to and trapped the PEGylated nanoparticles. Finally, we showed that trapped PEGylated nanoparticles remained largely in the luminal mucus layer of the mouse vagina even when delivered in hypotonic formulations that caused untrapped particles to be drawn by the flow of water (advection) through mucus all the way to the epithelial surface. These results underscore the potential importance of elucidating mucosal anti-PEG immune responses for PEGylated therapeutics and biomaterials applied to mucosal surfaces. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: PEG, generally considered a 'stealth' polymer, is broadly used to improve the circulation times and therapeutic efficacy of nanomedicines. Nevertheless, there is increasing scientific evidence that demonstrates both animals and humans can generate PEG-specific antibodies. Here, we show that anti-PEG IgG and IgM can specifically immobilize otherwise freely diffusing PEG-coated nanoparticles in fresh vaginal mucus gel ex vivo by crosslinking nanoparticles to the mucin mesh, and consequently prevent PEG-coated nanoparticles from accessing the vaginal epithelium in vivo. Given the increasing use of PEG coatings to enhance nanoparticle penetration of mucosal barriers, our findings demonstrate that anti-PEG immunity may be a potential concern not only for systemic drug delivery but also for mucosal drug delivery.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityCervix UteriDiffusionFemaleFrozen SectionsMiceMucusNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsTissue DistributionVaginaAntibodiesPolyethylene GlycolsDiffusionIgGIgMMucosal immunityNanomedicinePEGylation

Identifiers

PMID27424083
PMCPMC5645030
OpenAlexW2461553537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.