Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27424006›Full record

ReviewTransfusion medicine reviews2016

Research Opportunities to Improve Neonatal Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

Ravi Mangal Patel, Erin K Meyer, John A Widness

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion medicine reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Analysis of the Efficacy of Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Very Low Birth Weight Infants and Construction of a Prediction Model.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi Mangal PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: rmpatel@emory.edu.
Erin K MeyerDepartments of Pathology and Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
John A WidnessDepartment of Pediatrics, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine and University of Iowa Children's Hospital, Iowa City, IA.
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital · US

Funding

THE RoLE OF NEONATAL ANEMIA IN LEARNING AND MEMORYP01HL046925 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI JOSEPHSON, CASSANDRA D · 1992 to 2022
$34.3M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalKL2TR000455 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalTL1TR000456 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
Red Cell Transfusion, Severe Anemia and Necrotizing EnterocolitisK23HL128942 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, RAVI MANGAL · 2016 to 2019
$665k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000455NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000456NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL128942NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL046925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common and lifesaving therapy for anemic neonates and infants, particularly among those born prematurely or undergoing surgery. However, evidence-based indications for when to administer RBCs and adverse effects of RBC transfusion on important outcomes including necrotizing enterocolitis, survival, and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment remain uncertain. In addition, blood-banking practices for preterm and term neonates and infants have been largely developed using studies from older children and adults. Use of and refinements in emerging technologies and advances in biomarker discovery and neonatal-specific RBC transfusion databases may allow clinicians to better define and tailor RBC transfusion needs and practices to individual neonates. Decreasing the need for RBC transfusion and developing neonatal-specific approaches in the preparation of donor RBCs have potential for reducing resource utilization and cost, improving outcomes, and assuring blood safety. Finally, large donor-recipient-linked cohort studies can provide data to better understand the balance of the risks and benefits of RBC transfusion in neonates. These studies may also guide the translation of new research into best practices that can rapidly be integrated into routine care. This review highlights key opportunities in transfusion medicine and neonatology for improving the preparation and transfusion of RBCs into neonates and infants. We focus on timely, currently addressable knowledge gaps that can increase the safety and efficacy of preterm and term neonatal and infant RBC transfusion practices.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnemiaBirth WeightBlood BanksClinical Trials as TopicErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionErythropoietinHematologyHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeErythropoietinAnemiaHemoglobinInfantNewbornPrematurity, blood bank

Identifiers

PMID27424006
PMCPMC5026588
OpenAlexW2466482729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.