ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016
User-centered design of multi-gene sequencing panel reports for clinicians.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05562440 (The Perspective of Healthy Individuals on Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Report in The Indonesian Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Perspective of Healthy Individuals on Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Report in The Indonesian Population (Perspektif Para Individu Sehat Terhadap Laporan Prediksi Risiko Kanker Payudara)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- An open-source clinical bioinformatics pipeline for real-world NGS implementation: translating genomic variants into actionable treatment strategies in oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Determinants of targeted cancer therapy use in community oncology practice: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Rummler-Brache process mapping.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Recommendations for designing genetic test reports to be understood by patients and non-specialists.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- AMLVaran: a software approach to implement variant analysis of targeted NGS sequencing data in an oncological care setting.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- FHIR Lab Reports: using SMART on FHIR and CDS Hooks to increase the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic laboratory test results.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020Article
- Implementing the VMC Specification to Reduce Ambiguity in Genomic Variant Representation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
- Advances in Sharing Multi-sourced Health Data on Decision Support Science 2016-2017.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Review
- Prototype of a Standards-Based EHR and Genetic Test Reporting Tool Coupled with HL7-Compliant Infobuttons.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018Article
- A Review of Recent Advances in Translational Bioinformatics: Bridges from Biology to Medicine.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Integrating Genomic Resources with Electronic Health Records using the HL7 Infobutton Standard.Applied clinical informatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a high-fidelity prototype for delivering multi-gene sequencing panel (GS) reports to clinicians that simulates the user experience of a final application. The delivery and use of GS reports can occur within complex and high-paced healthcare environments. We employ a user-centered software design approach in a focus group setting in order to facilitate gathering rich contextual information from a diverse group of stakeholders potentially impacted by the delivery of GS reports relevant to two precision medicine programs at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Responses from focus group sessions were transcribed, coded and analyzed by two team members. Notification mechanisms and information resources preferred by participants from our first phase of focus groups were incorporated into scenarios and the design of a software prototype for delivering GS reports. The goal of our second phase of focus group, to gain input on the prototype software design, was accomplished through conducting task walkthroughs with GS reporting scenarios. Preferences for notification, content and consultation from genetics specialists appeared to depend upon familiarity with scenarios for ordering and delivering GS reports. Despite familiarity with some aspects of the scenarios we proposed, many of our participants agreed that they would likely seek consultation from a genetics specialist after viewing the test reports. In addition, participants offered design and content recommendations. Findings illustrated a need to support customized notification approaches, user-specific information, and access to genetics specialists with GS reports. These design principles can be incorporated into software applications that deliver GS reports. Our user-centered approach to conduct this assessment and the specific input we received from clinicians may also be relevant to others working on similar projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.