Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27423409›Full record

ReviewMedical image analysis2016

Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities.

Anant Madabhushi, George Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical image analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 435 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
435citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
84.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

435 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,034 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

375 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7207, United State. Electronic address: anantm@case.edu.
George LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7207, United State.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Software to facilitate multimode, multiscale fused data for Pathology and RadioloR01CA136535 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Decision support with MRI for targeting, evaluating laser ablation for prostate cR21CA167811 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2012 to 2013
$516k
Detecting Prostate Cancer using multi-protocol 3 Tesla in vivo MRI and MRSR21CA127186 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2007 to 2009
$403k
Histologic image-based aggressiveness prediction in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinomaR21CA179327 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2014 to 2015
$389k
Computerized morphologic-molecular predictor of progression in DCISR21CA195152 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BADVE, SUNIL S., MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2016
$388k
Decision Support System for Predicting outcome of ER+ breast cancersR43EB015199 · NIBIB · IBRIS, INC. · PI GANESAN, SHRIDAR, HARDING, DAVE · 2011 to 2011
$207k
Integrating Quantitative Histological Image and Vascular Density Patterns for ProR03CA143991 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2009 to 2010
$161k
Big data convergence of pathology and omics for disease prognosisK01ES026841 · NIEHS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, GEORGE · 2015 to 2015
$81k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136535NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R03 CA143991NCI NIH HHS R21 CA127186NCI NIH HHS R21 CA167811NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195152NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB015199NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise in whole slide scanner technology, large numbers of tissue slides are being scanned and represented and archived digitally. While digital pathology has substantial implications for telepathology, second opinions, and education there are also huge research opportunities in image computing with this new source of "big data". It is well known that there is fundamental prognostic data embedded in pathology images. The ability to mine "sub-visual" image features from digital pathology slide images, features that may not be visually discernible by a pathologist, offers the opportunity for better quantitative modeling of disease appearance and hence possibly improved prediction of disease aggressiveness and patient outcome. However the compelling opportunities in precision medicine offered by big digital pathology data come with their own set of computational challenges. Image analysis and computer assisted detection and diagnosis tools previously developed in the context of radiographic images are woefully inadequate to deal with the data density in high resolution digitized whole slide images. Additionally there has been recent substantial interest in combining and fusing radiologic imaging and proteomics and genomics based measurements with features extracted from digital pathology images for better prognostic prediction of disease aggressiveness and patient outcome. Again there is a paucity of powerful tools for combining disease specific features that manifest across multiple different length scales. The purpose of this review is to discuss developments in computational image analysis tools for predictive modeling of digital pathology images from a detection, segmentation, feature extraction, and tissue classification perspective. We discuss the emergence of new handcrafted feature approaches for improved predictive modeling of tissue appearance and also review the emergence of deep learning schemes for both object detection and tissue classification. We also briefly review some of the state of the art in fusion of radiology and pathology images and also combining digital pathology derived image measurements with molecular "omics" features for better predictive modeling. The review ends with a brief discussion of some of the technical and computational challenges to be overcome and reflects on future opportunities for the quantitation of histopathology.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningHumansPathologyPrecision MedicineRadiologyTelepathologyDeep learningDigital pathologyOmicsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID27423409
PMCPMC5556681
OpenAlexW2470965540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.