Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2016
Predictors and moderators of response to enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for the treatment of eating disorders.
Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Dropout, Outcome, and Relapse in Web-Based Guided Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Enhanced Among Patients With Binge-Eating Disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Trial
- Mechanisms of Change in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Binge-Eating Disorder: A Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling Approach.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Trial
- Established and emerging treatments for eating disorders.Trends in molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Web-based guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced versus treatment as usual for binge-eating disorder: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring effectiveness of CBT in obese patients with binge eating disorder: personality functioning is associated with clinically significant change.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Patient use of a self-monitoring app during eating disorder treatment: Naturalistic longitudinal cohort study.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Sexual and gender minority individuals report higher rates of abuse and more severe eating disorder symptoms than cisgender heterosexual individuals at admission to eating disorder treatment.The International journal of eating disorders · 2020Article
- Comparing a Tailored Self-Help Mobile App With a Standard Self-Monitoring App for the Treatment of Eating Disorder Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Predictors of Response to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder.Behavior therapy · 2019Article
- Article
- Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives.Psychology research and behavior management · 2018Review
- Form and formulation: Examining the distinctiveness of body image constructs in treatment-seeking patients with binge-eating disorder.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Consistent predictors, and more especially moderators, of response to psychological treatments for eating disorders have not been identified. The present exploratory study examined predictors and moderators of outcome in adult patients who took part in a randomised clinical trial comparing two leading treatments for these disorders, enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-E) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). Four potentially important findings emerged. Firstly, patients with a longer duration of disorder were less likely to benefit from either treatment. Second, across the two treatments the presence, at baseline, of higher levels of over-evaluation of the importance of shape predicted a less good treatment outcome. Third DSM-IV diagnosis did not predict treatment outcome. Fourth, with the exception of patients with baseline low self-esteem who achieved a better outcome with CBT-E, it was generally not possible to identify a subgroup of patients who would differentially benefit from one or other treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.