Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27423143›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2016

Clinical Chemistry Reference Intervals for C57BL/6J, C57BL/6N, and C3HeB/FeJ Mice (Mus musculus).

Gordon P Otto, Birgit Rathkolb, Manuela A Oestereicher, Christoph J Lengger, Corinna Moerth, Kateryna Micklich, Helmut Fuchs, Valérie Gailus-Durner, Eckhard Wolf, Martin Hrabě de Angelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biological Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. JBMR plus · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Engineered Un1Cas12f1 with boosted gene-editing activity and expanded genomic coverage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gordon P OttoCenter for Sepsis Control and Care and Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany; German Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Birgit RathkolbGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany. birgit.rathkolb@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Manuela A OestereicherGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christoph J LenggerGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Corinna MoerthGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Kateryna MicklichGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Molecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FuchsGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Valérie Gailus-DurnerGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Eckhard WolfMolecular Animal Breeding and Biotechnology, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Martin Hrabě de AngelisGerman Mouse Clinic, Institute of Experimental Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Germany; German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany; Experimental Genetics, Center of Life and Food Sciences, Weihenstephan, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although various mouse inbred strains are widely used to investigate disease mechanisms and to establish new therapeutic strategies, sex-specific reference intervals for laboratory diagnostic analytes that are generated from large numbers of animals have been unavailable. In this retrospective study, we screened data from more than 12,000 mice phenotyped in the German Mouse Clinic from January 2006 through June 2014 and selected animals with the genetic background of C57BL/6J, C57BL/6N, or C3HeB/FeJ. In addition, we distinguished between the C57BL/6NTac substrain and C57BL/6N mice received from other vendors. The corresponding data sets of electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, inorganic phosphate), lipids (cholesterol, triglyceride), and enzyme activities (ALT, AST, ALP, α-amylase) and urea, albumin, and total protein levels were analyzed. Significant effects of age and sex on these analytes were identified, and strain- or substrain- and sex-specific reference intervals for 90- to 135-d-old mice were calculated. In addition, we include an overview of the literature that reports clinical chemistry values for wild-type mice of different strains. Our results support researchers interpreting clinical chemistry values from various mouse mutants and corresponding wild-type controls based on the examined strains and substrains.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemistry, ClinicalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLPhenotypeReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID27423143
PMCPMC4943607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.