Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27423045›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2016

Chemical genetics approaches for selective intervention in epigenetics.

Andrew C Runcie, Kwok-Ho Chan, Michael Zengerle, Alessio Ciulli

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A selective BCL-XNature medicine · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The PROTAC technology in drug development.Cell biochemistry and function · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Target validation: Switching domains.Nature chemical biology · 2016
    Article
  16. PROTACs: great opportunities for academia and industry.Signal transduction and targeted therapy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew C RuncieSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Kwok-Ho ChanSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Michael ZengerleSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Alessio CiulliSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Division of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, James Black Centre, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK. Electronic address: a.ciulli@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Dundee · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023123/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J001201/2European Research Council 311460Welcome Trust 100476/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical genetics is the use of biologically active small molecules (chemical probes) to investigate the functions of gene products, through the modulation of protein activity. Recent years have seen significant progress in the application of chemical genetics to study epigenetics, following the development of new chemical probes, a growing appreciation of the role of epigenetics in disease and a recognition of the need and utility of high-quality, cell-active chemical probes. In this review, we single out the bromodomain reader domains as a prime example of both the success, and challenges facing chemical genetics. The difficulty in generating single-target selectivity has long been a thorn in the side of chemical genetics, however, recent developments in advanced forms of chemical genetics promise to bypass this, and other, limitations. The 'bump-and-hole' approach has now been used to probe - for the first time - the BET bromodomain subfamily with single-target selectivity and may be applicable to other epigenetic domains. Meanwhile, PROTAC compounds have been shown to be significantly more efficacious than standard domain inhibitors, and have the potential to enhance target selectivity.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticHumans

Identifiers

PMID27423045
PMCPMC5061558
OpenAlexW2473803612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.