Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422831›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2016

Enrichment of Root Endophytic Bacteria from Populus deltoides and Single-Cell-Genomics Analysis.

Sagar M Utturkar, W Nathan Cude, Michael S Robeson, Zamin K Yang, Dawn M Klingeman, Miriam L Land, Steve L Allman, Tse-Yuan S Lu, Steven D Brown, Christopher W Schadt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Genomic signatures inmSystems · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How genomics can help unravel the evolution of endophytic fungi.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  9. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enriching the endophytic bacterial microbiota ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sagar M UtturkarBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
W Nathan CudeBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Michael S RobesonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Zamin K YangBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Dawn M KlingemanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Miriam L LandBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Steve L AllmanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Tse-Yuan S LuBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Steven D BrownBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher W SchadtBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Mircea PodarBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Mitchel J DoktyczBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Dale A PelletierBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA pelletierda@ornl.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBacterial endophytes that colonize Populus trees contribute to nutrient acquisition, prime immunity responses, and directly or indirectly increase both above- and below-ground biomasses. Endophytes are embedded within plant material, so physical separation and isolation are difficult tasks. Application of culture-independent methods, such as metagenome or bacterial transcriptome sequencing, has been limited due to the predominance of DNA from the plant biomass. Here, we describe a modified differential and density gradient centrifugation-based protocol for the separation of endophytic bacteria from Populus roots. This protocol achieved substantial reduction in contaminating plant DNA, allowed enrichment of endophytic bacteria away from the plant material, and enabled single-cell genomics analysis. Four single-cell genomes were selected for whole-genome amplification based on their rarity in the microbiome (potentially uncultured taxa) as well as their inferred abilities to form associations with plants. Bioinformatics analyses, including assembly, contamination removal, and completeness estimation, were performed to obtain single-amplified genomes (SAGs) of organisms from the phyla Armatimonadetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Planctomycetes, which were unrepresented in our previous cultivation efforts. Comparative genomic analysis revealed unique characteristics of each SAG that could facilitate future cultivation efforts for these bacteria. IMPORTANCE: Plant roots harbor a diverse collection of microbes that live within host tissues. To gain a comprehensive understanding of microbial adaptations to this endophytic lifestyle from strains that cannot be cultivated, it is necessary to separate bacterial cells from the predominance of plant tissue. This study provides a valuable approach for the separation and isolation of endophytic bacteria from plant root tissue. Isolated live bacteria provide material for microbiome sequencing, single-cell genomics, and analyses of genomes of uncultured bacteria to provide genomics information that will facilitate future cultivation attempts.

Indexed as

BacteriaCentrifugation, Density GradientComputational BiologyEndophytesMetagenomicsPlant RootsPopulusSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27422831
PMCPMC5007785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.