Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422778›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.

Ashley Elrick, Sato Ashida, Jennifer Ivanovich, Sarah Lyons, Barbara B Biesecker, Melody S Goodman, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley ElrickDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Ashley.Elrick@hci.utah.edu.
Sato AshidaCollege of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jennifer IvanovichDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sarah LyonsDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Barbara B BieseckerSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Melody S GoodmanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Utah Center of Excellence in ELSI Research: UCEERRM1HG009037 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROTHWELL, ERIN, TABERY, JAMES · 2016 to 2024
$8.0M
Interventions in Genetic CounselingZIAHG200317 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, BARBARA BOWLES · 2009 to 2018
$7.6M
COMMUNICATION PREFERENCES FOR GENOME SEQUENCING RESULTS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTSR01CA168608 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MELODY S, KAPHINGST, KIMBERLY A · 2012 to 2014
$826k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168608NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic test results have medical implications beyond the patient that extend to biological family members. We examined psychosocial and clinical factors associated with communication of genetic test results within families. Women (N = 1080) diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger completed an online survey; 920 women that reported prior cancer genetic testing were included in analysis. We examined the proportion of immediate family members to whom they communicated genetic test results, and built multivariable regression models to examine clinical and psychosocial variables associated with the proportion score. Participants were most likely to communicate test results to their mother (83 %) and least likely to their son (45 %). Participants who carried a BRCA mutation (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI = 1.06, 1.70), had higher interest in genomic information (OR = 1.55; 95 % CI = 1.26, 1.91) and lower genetic worry (OR = 0.91; 95 % CI = 0.86, 0.96) communicated genetic test results to a greater proportion of their immediate family members. Participants with a BRCA1/2 mutation shared their genetic test results with more male family members (OR = 1.72; 95 % CI = 1.02, 2.89). Our findings suggest that patients with high worry about genetic risks, low interest in genomic information, or receive a negative genetic test result will likely need additional support to encourage family communication.

Indexed as

DisclosureGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdultBreast NeoplasmsCommunicationFamilyFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic CounselingHumansMutationBRCA 1/2Breast cancerFamily communicationGenetics

Identifiers

PMID27422778
PMCPMC5239754
OpenAlexW2460724727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.