ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2016
Production of hand-made cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos from non-viable somatic cells.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Production of Cloned Bighorn Sheep Embryos Using ISCNT via HMC from Domestic Sheep Oocytes Treated with Resveratrol During IVM.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of non-viable somatic cells for hand-made cloning (HMC) can enable production of cloned animals from tissues obtained from elite or endangered dead animals. Buffalo skin fibroblast cells were rendered non-viable by heat treatment and used for HMC. Although fusion (93.6 ± 1.72 vs 67.1 ± 2.83%) and cleavage (90.3 ± 1.79 vs 65.8 ± 1.56%) rate was lower (P < 0.001) than that for controls, blastocysts could be successfully produced. However, blastocyst rate (34.1 ± 2.43 vs 6.9 ± 2.18%, P < 0.001) and total cell number of blastocysts (TCN, 221.3 ± 25.14 vs 151.1 ± 21.69, P < 0.05) were lower and apoptotic index (4.8 ± 1.06 vs 10.9 ± 1.21) was higher (P < 0.001) than that of controls. In another experiment, ear tissue of slaughterhouse buffaloes was preserved in mustard oil at room temperature for 48 h following which somatic cells were harvested by enzymatic digestion and used for HMC. Although fusion (96.8 ± 1.48 vs 84.2 ± 3.19%), cleavage (89.6 ± 3.59 vs 77.2 ± 3.99%), and blastocyst rate (36.9 ± 7.45 vs 13.1 ± 6.87%) were lower (P < 0.01), TCN (223.0 ± 27.89 vs 213.3 ± 28.21) and apoptotic index (3.97 ± 0.67 vs 5.22 ± 0.51) of blastocysts were similar to those of controls. In conclusion, HMC can be successfully used for production of blastocysts from non-viable cells and from cells obtained from freshly slaughtered buffaloes. This can pave the way for the restoration of farm or wild animals by HMC if somatic cells could be obtained within a few hours after their death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.