Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422520›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2016

Human Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism Responses to Amino Acid Nutrition.

W Kyle Mitchell, Daniel J Wilkinson, Bethan E Phillips, Jonathan N Lund, Kenneth Smith, Philip J Atherton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effects ofNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W Kyle MitchellDepartment of Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom; and.
Daniel J WilkinsonMedical Research Council, Arthritis Research United Kingdom, Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom.
Bethan E PhillipsMedical Research Council, Arthritis Research United Kingdom, Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom.
Jonathan N LundDepartment of Surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom; and, Medical Research Council, Arthritis Research United Kingdom, Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom.
Kenneth SmithMedical Research Council, Arthritis Research United Kingdom, Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom.
Philip J AthertonMedical Research Council, Arthritis Research United Kingdom, Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom philip.atherton@nottingham.ac.uk.
Royal Derby Hospital · GBMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy individuals maintain remarkably constant skeletal muscle mass across much of adult life, suggesting the existence of robust homeostatic mechanisms. Muscle exists in dynamic equilibrium whereby the influx of amino acids (AAs) and the resulting increases in muscle protein synthesis (MPS) associated with the intake of dietary proteins cancel out the efflux of AAs from muscle protein breakdown that occurs between meals. Dysregulated proteostasis is evident with aging, especially beyond the sixth decade of life. Women and men aged 75 y lose muscle mass at a rate of ∼0.7% and 1%/y, respectively (sarcopenia), and lose strength 2- to 5-fold faster (dynapenia) as muscle "quality" decreases. Factors contributing to the disruption of an otherwise robust proteostatic system represent targets for potential therapies that promote healthy aging. Understanding age-related impairments in anabolic responses to AAs and identifying strategies to mitigate these factors constitute major areas of interest. Numerous studies have aimed to identify 1) the influence of distinct protein sources on absorption kinetics and muscle anabolism, 2) the latency and time course of MPS responses to protein/AAs, 3) the impacts of protein/AA intake on muscle microvascular recruitment, and 4) the role of certain AAs (e.g., leucine) as signaling molecules, which are able to trigger anabolic pathways in tissues. This review aims to discuss these 4 issues listed, to provide historical and modern perspectives of AAs as modulators of human skeletal muscle protein metabolism, to describe how advances in stable isotope/mass spectrometric approaches and instrumentation have underpinned these advances, and to highlight relevant differences between young adults and older individuals. Whenever possible, observations are based on human studies, with additional consideration of relevant nonhuman studies.

Indexed as

AgedAgingAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsFemaleHealthy AgingHumansMaleMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle WeaknessNutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusProteostasisSarcopeniaAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsMuscle Proteinsagingamino acidsleucinemetabolismmuscle

Identifiers

PMID27422520
PMCPMC4942869
OpenAlexW2468143992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.