Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422495›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Receipt of Pressure Equalization Tubes Among US Children, 2014.

Alan E Simon, Emily F Boss, Carla E Zelaya, Howard J Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Approaching Social Determinants of Health in Otolaryngology - Head Neck Surgery: Linking Needs to Resources to Promote Health Equity.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Do race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status affect why we place ear tubes in children?International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alan E SimonNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md. Electronic address: aes360@hotmail.com.
Emily F BossDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
Carla E ZelayaNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Md.
Howard J HoffmanEpidemiology and Statistics Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
National Center for Health Statistics · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Shared Decision-Making and Outcomes in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered BreathingK08HS022932 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOSS, EMILY FRANCES · 2014 to 2018
$787k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS022932Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePressure equalization tube (PET) placement (also referred to as tympanostomy tube placement) is among the most common ambulatory surgical procedures performed on US children. More than 20 years ago, differences according to race/ethnicity in the national prevalence of having had PETs placed were documented. Whether these differences persist is unknown.

methodsWe used data from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey to examine the percentage of children 0 to 17 years of age who have ever undergone PET placement. Unadjusted logistic regression with predictive margins was used to assess the relationship between having received PETs and race/ethnicity, as well as other clinical, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether other factors could account for any observed differences according to race/ethnicity.

resultsOverall, 8.9% of children 0 to 17 years of age had undergone PET surgery. By race/ethnicity, 12.6% of non-Hispanic white children received PETs, which was significantly greater than the 4.8% of non-Hispanic black, 4.4% of Hispanic, and 5.6% of non-Hispanic other/multiple race children who had this surgery (P < .001 for all comparisons). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted prevalence for non-Hispanic white children (10.8%) was greater than for non-Hispanic black (5.4%) and Hispanic (5.8%) children (P < .001 for both comparisons).

conclusionsNearly 9% of US children have had PETs placed. Non-Hispanic white children still have a greater prevalence of PET placement compared with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children. These differences could not be fully explained by other demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, or geographic differences between racial/ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentBlack or African AmericanChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseEthnicityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansIncomeInfantInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthLogistic Modelsdisparitiesgrommetspressure-equalizing tubestympanostomy tubesventilation tubes

Identifiers

PMID27422495
PMCPMC5167642
OpenAlexW2474380230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.