Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422403›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

Experiences with insecticide-treated curtains: a qualitative study in Iquitos, Peru.

Valerie A Paz-Soldan, Karin M Bauer, Audrey Lenhart, Jhonny J Cordova Lopez, John P Elder, Thomas W Scott, Philip J McCall, Tadeusz J Kochel, Amy C Morrison

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Use of Insecticide-Treated Curtains for Control ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie A Paz-SoldanDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA. vpazsold@tulane.edu.
Karin M BauerDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Audrey LenhartEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jhonny J Cordova LopezDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
John P ElderDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Thomas W ScottDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Philip J McCallDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Tadeusz J KochelVirology Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Amy C MorrisonDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBTulane University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institutes of Health · USNaval Medical Research Command · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Surveillance Core (B)P01AI098670 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI STODDARD, STEVEN TODD · 2014 to 2018
$7.9M
Measuring Entomological Risk for DengueR01AI069341 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCOTT, THOMAS WALLACE · 2006 to 2010
$2.3M
Examining Human Behavior in Dengue Prevention Efforts in Iquitos, PeruK01TW008414 · FIC · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI PAZ-SOLDAN, VALERIE ANDREA · 2010 to 2013
$412k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW008414NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI098670NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069341Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT085714MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is an arthropod-borne viral disease responsible for approximately 400 million infections annually; the only available method of prevention is vector control. It has been previously demonstrated that insecticide treated curtains (ITCs) can lower dengue vector infestations in and around houses. As part of a larger trial examining whether ITCs could reduce dengue transmission in Iquitos, Peru, the objective of this study was to characterize the participants' experience with the ITCs using qualitative methods.

methodsKnowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) surveys (at baseline, and 9 and 27 months post-ITC distribution, with n = 593, 595 and 511, respectively), focus group discussions (at 6 and 12 months post-ITC distribution, with n = 18 and 33, respectively), and 11 one-on-one interviews (at 12 months post-distribution) were conducted with 605 participants who received ITCs as part of a cluster-randomized trial.

resultsFocus groups at 6 months post-ITC distribution revealed that individuals had observed their ITCs to function for approximately 3 months, after which they reported the ITCs were no longer working. Follow up revealed that the ITCs required re-treatment with insecticide at approximately 1 year post-distribution. Over half (55.3 %, n = 329) of participants at 9 months post-ITC distribution and over a third (34.8 %, n = 177) at 27 months post-ITC distribution reported perceiving a decrease in the number of mosquitoes in their home. The percentage of participants who would recommend ITCs to their family or friends in the future remained high throughout the study (94.3 %, n = 561 at 9 months and 94.6 %, n = 488 at 27 months post-distribution). When asked why, participants reported that ITCs were effective at reducing mosquitoes (81.6 and 37.8 %, at 9 and 27 months respectively), that they prevent dengue (5.7 and 51.2 %, at 9 and 27 months), that they are "beautiful" (5.9 and 3.1 %), as well as other reasons (6.9 and 2.5 %).

conclusionITCs have substantial potential for long term dengue vector control because they are liked by users, both for their perceived effectiveness and for aesthetic reasons, and because they require little proactive behavioral effort on the part of the users. Our results highlight the importance of gathering process (as opposed to outcome) data during vector control studies, without which researchers would not have become aware that the ITCs had lost effectiveness early in the trial.

Indexed as

AdultAedesAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsArthropod VectorsDengueFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMaleMiddle AgedMosquito ControlPeruDengueInsecticide treated curtains (ITC)PeruQualitative

Identifiers

PMID27422403
PMCPMC4947330
OpenAlexW2462046337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.