Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2016
A Randomized Trial of Social Comparison Feedback and Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity.
Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02030080 (A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Economic Interventions to Improve Physical Activities), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of Behavioral Economic Interventions to Improve Physical Activities: Framing vs Incentives
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining social comparison as a behaviour change technique across the behavioural sciences.Nature human behaviour · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Behavioral Economic Incentive Programs for Goal Achievement on Healthy Diet, Weight Control and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Do physical activity interventions combining self-monitoring with other components provide an additional benefit compared with self-monitoring alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Individuals' Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2021Pooled it
- Just-in-Time Feedback in Diet and Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Practical Design Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Use and effectiveness of behavioural economics in interventions for lifestyle risk factors of non-communicable diseases: a systematic review with policy implications.Perspectives in public health · 2018Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Behavioral Economic Interventions for Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Current diabetes reports · 2017Pooled it
- Combining anchoring with financial incentives to increase physical activity: a randomized controlled trial among college students.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility and outcomes from using a commitment device and text message reminders to increase adherence to time-restricted eating: A randomized trial.American heart journal · 2023Trial
- Association between behavioral phenotypes and sustained use of smartphones and wearable devices to remotely monitor physical activity.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Effect of Gamification With and Without Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Veterans Classified as Having Obesity or Overweight: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Effect of Behaviorally Designed Gamification With Social Incentives on Lifestyle Modification Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- A randomized controlled trial to evaluate a behavioral economic strategy for improving mobility in veterans with chronic pain.PloS one · 2021Trial
- A randomized controlled trial study of the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary impact of SITA (SMS as an Incentive To Adhere): a mobile technology-based intervention informed by behavioral economics to improve ART adherence among youth in Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Trial
- Active Children Through Individual Vouchers Evaluation: A Mixed-Method RCT.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Trial
- Effect of Different Financial Incentive Structures on Promoting Physical Activity Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Social Incentives and Gamification to Promote Weight Loss: The LOSE IT Randomized, Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Piloting the Use of Smartphones, Reminders, and Accountability Partners to Promote Skin Self-Examinations in Patients with Total Body Photography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2018Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the effectiveness of different combinations of social comparison feedback and financial incentives to increase physical activity.
designRandomized trial (Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02030080).
settingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania.
participantsTwo hundred eighty-six adults.
interventionsTwenty-six weeks of weekly feedback on team performance compared to the 50th percentile (n = 100) or the 75th percentile (n = 64) and 13 weeks of weekly lottery-based financial incentive plus feedback on team performance compared to the 50th percentile (n = 80) or the 75th percentile (n = 44) followed by 13 weeks of only performance feedback. MEASURES: Mean proportion of participant-days achieving the 7000-step goal during the 13-week intervention. ANALYSIS: Generalized linear mixed models adjusting for repeated measures and clustering by team.
resultsCompared to the 75th percentile without incentives during the intervention period, the mean proportion achieving the 7000-step goal was significantly greater for the 50th percentile with incentives group (0.45 vs 0.27, difference: 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04 to 0.32; P = .012) but not for the 75th percentile with incentives group (0.38 vs 0.27, difference: 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.27; P = .19) or the 50th percentile without incentives group (0.30 vs 0.27, difference: 0.03, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.16; P = .67).
conclusionSocial comparison to the 50th percentile with financial incentives was most effective for increasing physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.