Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422250›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Reoperative thyroid surgery: can endoscopic areola approach be used?

Bingsheng Guan, Jinyi Li, Wah Yang, Jingge Yang, Guo Cao, Peng Sun, Cunchuan Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of the endoscopic thyroidectomyFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bingsheng GuanDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jinyi LiDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Wah YangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jingge YangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Guo CaoDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Peng SunDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Cunchuan WangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. wangcunchuan@tom.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReoperative thyroid surgery is associated with a higher morbidity and has traditionally been done in conventional open approach. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic areola approach for reoperative thyroid surgery.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in 46 patients undergoing reoperative thyroid surgery with endoscopic areola approach (endoscopic group) and 70 patients with conventional open approach (open group). Perioperative and follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.

resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Except for two cases of the endoscopic group intraoperatively converted to open surgery, all the other surgery was successfully completed. No significant difference was found between two groups concerning operation time, drainage volume, drainage time and postoperative hospital stay (all P > 0.05). Estimated blood loss was more in the open group than the endoscopic group (P = 0.000). Although not statistically significant, the overall complication rate was less in the endoscopic group than in the open group (21.7 vs. 37.1 %, P = 0.079). Of these complications, transient hypocalcemia was the most common (endoscopic group, 17.4 %; open group, 21.4 %; P = 0.594). One patient of the endoscopic group and 7 patients of the open group suffered from transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis (P = 0.210). Moreover, 2 patients of open group experienced permanent RLN paralysis. During the follow-up period (range 1-6 years), no recurrent case was encountered, but the endoscopic group had a higher cosmetic score (9.0 ± 0.9 vs. 5.9 ± 0.9, P = 0.000).

conclusionIn high-volume centers, with strict operation indication, sufficient preoperative evaluation and careful surgical maneuvers, endoscopic areola approach is a safe and effective method for reoperative thyroid surgery, allowing to provide a better cosmetic result and reduce intraoperative blood loss compared with open approach.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Loss, SurgicalEndoscopyEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNipplesPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesThyroidectomyVocal Cord ParalysisAreola approachConventional open approachEndoscopic thyroidectomyReoperative thyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID27422250
OpenAlexW2469438545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.