Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422128›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma.

Anne Hertenstein, Thomas Hielscher, Oliver Menn, Benedikt Wiestler, Frank Winkler, Michael Platten, Wolfgang Wick, Antje Wick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne HertensteinNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HielscherDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver MennNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt WiestlerNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank WinklerNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael PlattenNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfgang WickNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Antje WickNeurology Clinic & National Center for Tumor Disease, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. antje.wick@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
German Cancer Research Center · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab is frequently used in patients with progressive glioblastoma raising questions regarding frequency of treatments, dosage, duration of therapy and the possibility of tapering and discontinuation for selected patient groups. We retrospectively assessed the safety and outcome of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for reasons other than disease progression and toxicity in 19 patients with progressive glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab for at least 6 months. In 10 of the 19 patients tapering bevacizumab resulted in complete discontinuation and reinitiation after disease progression during halted treatment. As a comparison group 33 patients with bevacizumab for at least 6 months continuously dosed at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks were selected. Age and Karnofsky performance status at start of bevacizumab were similar in both groups. Influenced by the selection process, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the group receiving a tapered and discontinued bevacizumab regimen (PFS 22.7 versus 11.2 months, HR 0.33, p-value = 0.01; OS 29.9 versus 15.5 months, HR 0.22, p-value = 0.001) with a median time of discontinuation of 4.5 months (range: 1.9-44.2 months). Stable disease or partial response according to RANO at ≥3 months was achieved in 89 % of patients with reinitiated bevacizumab therapy after discontinuation. These data indicate that tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for other reasons than progression is feasible without an increased risk for tumor rebound or unresponsiveness to reinitiated bevacizumab therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabDacarbazineTemozolomideAntiangiogenic treatmentsBevacizumabGlioblastomaRANO

Identifiers

PMID27422128
OpenAlexW2471706245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.