Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27422105›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2016

Photodynamic inactivation of pathogenic species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans with lutetium (III) acetate phthalocyanines and specific light irradiation.

Vanya Mantareva, Vesselin Kussovski, Mahmut Durmuş, Ekaterina Borisova, Ivan Angelov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metals to combat antimicrobial resistance.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2023
    Review
  3. Latest trends on photodynamic disinfection of Gram-negative bacteria: photosensitizer's structure and delivery systems.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanya MantarevaInstitute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev str., Bl. 9, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria. mantareva@yahoo.com.
Vesselin KussovskiThe Stephan Angeloff Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev str., Bl. 26, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Mahmut DurmuşDepartment of Chemistry, Gebze Technical University, P. O. Box 141, Gebze, Kocaeli, 41400, Turkey.
Ekaterina BorisovaInstitute of Electronics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Tzarigradsko chaussee blvd, 1784, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ivan AngelovInstitute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev str., Bl. 9, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry · BGBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGGebze Technical University · TRStephan Angeloff Institute of Microbiology · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) is a light-associated therapeutic approach suitable for treatment of local acute infections. The method is based on specific light-activated compound which by specific irradiation and in the presence of molecular oxygen produced molecular singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species, all toxic for pathogenic microbial cells. The study presents photodynamic impact of two recently synthesized water-soluble cationic lutetium (III) acetate phthalocyanines (LuPc-5 and LuPc-6) towards two pathogenic strains, namely, the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a fungus Candida albicans. The photodynamic effect was evaluated for the cells in suspensions and organized in 48-h developed biofilms. The relatively high levels of uptakes of LuPc-5 and LuPc-6 were determined for fungal cells compared to bacterial cells. The penetration depths and distribution of both LuPcs into microbial biofilms were investigated by means of confocal fluorescence microscopy. The photoinactivation efficiency was studied for a wide concentration range (0.85-30 μM) of LuPc-5 and LuPc-6 at a light dose of 50 J cm

Indexed as

AcetatesAnti-Infective AgentsBiofilmsCandida albicansIndolesIsoindolesLasers, SemiconductorLutetiumMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityPhotosensitizing AgentsPseudomonas aeruginosaAcetatesAnti-Infective AgentsIndolesIsoindolesLutetiumPhotosensitizing AgentsphthalocyanineBlue diode laserCandida albicansLutetium (III) phthalocyaninesPhotodynamic inactivationPseudomonas aeruginosaRed light-emitting diode

Identifiers

PMID27422105
OpenAlexW2469164469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.