ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2017
The pathophysiology of survival in harsh environments.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Trade-offs between reproduction and health in free-ranging African striped mice.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An individual's ability to survive harsh conditions might depend on its available energy, and also on its health, which is expected to decline as conditions deteriorate. Yet, we know little about how health and energy expenditure are shaped by harsh environmental conditions in free-living vertebrates. Here, we studied how African striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) that survived summer droughts differed in their energy expenditure and health from non-survivors. Specifically, we tested whether: (1) survivors' and non-survivors' health and energy expenditure differed before environmental conditions declined; (2) non-survivors were in poorer health and had greater energy expenditure than survivors when conditions were harshest; (3) non-survivors' health deteriorated more than that of survivors as conditions deteriorated; and (4) survivors recovered once conditions improved. Survivors and non-survivors' health was assessed using VetsScan ABAXIS, while energy expenditure was measured as resting metabolic rate (RMR). Before conditions declined, non-survivors had lower energy stores and higher globulin levels than survivors. As conditions became harsher, survivors' and non-survivors' health deteriorated but only non-survivors showed signs of permanent pathology (increased glucose and decreased globulin). Once conditions improved, survivors' health improved but was not fully restored (increased alanine aminotransferase and decreased globulin). Furthermore, while survivors and non-survivors had similar RMR before conditions became harsh; their levels diverged considerably when conditions deteriorated, with survivors having a decreased RMR and non-survivors having an increased RMR. Our results show that an individual's health before facing an environmental challenge and the way it regulates its RMR influences its ability to maintain homeostasis when conditions become more taxing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.