Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421750›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

The SOS-framework (Systems of Sedentary behaviours): an international transdisciplinary consensus framework for the study of determinants, research priorities and policy on sedentary behaviour across the life course: a DEDIPAC-study.

Sebastien F M Chastin, Marieke De Craemer, Nanna Lien, Claire Bernaards, Christoph Buck, Jean-Michel Oppert, Julie-Anne Nazare, Jeroen Lakerveld, Grainne O'Donoghue, Michelle Holdsworth and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Factors influencing obesogenic behaviours of adolescent girls and women in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modifiable determinants of older adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior in community and healthcare settings: a DE-PASS systematic review and meta-analysis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Sebastien F M ChastinInstitute for Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK. Sebastien.Chastin@gcu.ac.uk.
Marieke De CraemerDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nanna LienDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Claire BernaardsTNO, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christoph BuckLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Jean-Michel OppertDepartment of nutrition, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Institute of cardiometabolism and nutrition (ICAN), Pitie-Salpêtrière hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Julie-Anne NazareCARMEN, Inserm U1060, Université de Lyon 1, Inra U1235, Lyon, France.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Grainne O'DonoghueCentre for Preventive Medicine, School of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Michelle HoldsworthPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research-ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Neville OwenBaker IDI, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Johannes BrugDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
DEDIPAC consortium, expert working group and consensus panel
Ghent University · BEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUDublin City University · IEGlasgow Caledonian University · GBHospices Civils de Lyon · FRLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DENetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLUnité de recherche sur les maladies cardiovasculaires et métaboliques · FRUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological models are currently the most used approaches to classify and conceptualise determinants of sedentary behaviour, but these approaches are limited in their ability to capture the complexity of and interplay between determinants. The aim of the project described here was to develop a transdisciplinary dynamic framework, grounded in a system-based approach, for research on determinants of sedentary behaviour across the life span and intervention and policy planning and evaluation.

methodsA comprehensive concept mapping approach was used to develop the Systems Of Sedentary behaviours (SOS) framework, involving four main phases: (1) preparation, (2) generation of statements, (3) structuring (sorting and ranking), and (4) analysis and interpretation. The first two phases were undertaken between December 2013 and February 2015 by the DEDIPAC KH team (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity Knowledge Hub). The last two phases were completed during a two-day consensus meeting in June 2015.

resultsDuring the first phase, 550 factors regarding sedentary behaviour were listed across three age groups (i.e., youths, adults and older adults), which were reduced to a final list of 190 life course factors in phase 2 used during the consensus meeting. In total, 69 international delegates, seven invited experts and one concept mapping consultant attended the consensus meeting. The final framework obtained during that meeting consisted of six clusters of determinants: Physical Health and Wellbeing (71% consensus), Social and Cultural Context (59% consensus), Built and Natural Environment (65% consensus), Psychology and Behaviour (80% consensus), Politics and Economics (78% consensus), and Institutional and Home Settings (78% consensus). Conducting studies on Institutional Settings was ranked as the first research priority. The view that this framework captures a system-based map of determinants of sedentary behaviour was expressed by 89% of the participants.

conclusionThrough an international transdisciplinary consensus process, the SOS framework was developed for the determinants of sedentary behaviour through the life course. Investigating the influence of Institutional and Home Settings was deemed to be the most important area of research to focus on at present and potentially the most modifiable. The SOS framework can be used as an important tool to prioritise future research and to develop policies to reduce sedentary time.

Indexed as

ConsensusHealth BehaviorResearchSedentary BehaviorDietEnvironmentExerciseHealth PolicyHumansInternational CooperationAdultsAgeingConcept mappingDeterminantsEnvironmentEuropeLife-courseOlder adultsPolicyPublic healthSedentary behaviourSittingSystem-based approachYouth

Identifiers

PMID27421750
PMCPMC4947275
OpenAlexW2471009028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.