Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421721›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2017

Detection of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive overview of methodology pitfalls and benefits.

Manca Ogrič, Matic Terčelj, Sonja Praprotnik, Matija Tomšič, Borut Božič, Snezna Sodin-Semrl, Saša Čučnik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manca OgričDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matic TerčeljDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sonja PraprotnikDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matija TomšičDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Borut BožičDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Snezna Sodin-SemrlDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Saša ČučnikDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre-Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. sasa.cucnik@guest.arnes.si.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About a third of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab may develop anti-adalimumab antibodies. Anti-adalimumab antibodies are associated with reduced drug levels, loss of drug efficacy, clinical non-response and an increased risk of adverse effects. In case of suspected drug failure and in order to better define clinical efficacy, adalimumab as well as anti-adalimumab antibodies levels should be monitored. Sandwich or indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay is most commonly used for determining adalimumab, while bridging ELISA and antigen-binding test are most useful for determining anti-adalimumab antibodies. Most current assays cannot detect antibodies complexed with the adalimumab; however, methods for dissociation of the complexes using acid/temperature have been developed. The aim of this review is to report on the latest methodology for detecting adalimumab and anti-ADL antibodies, benefits of their detections in clinical practice, as well as expose problematic issues, such as different analytical sensitivity and specificity, standardization and validation. The main problem in measuring adalimumab or anti-ADL antibodies is high drug sensitivity, which can result in false-negative anti-ADL antibodies. Therefore, drug-tolerant assays have been developed. Cell-based assays, such as the reporter gene assay, are recommended for detection of functionally active adalimumab and their neutralizing anti-ADL antibodies.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidHumansImmunoassayAdalimumabAntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsAdalimumabAnti-drug antibodiesInflammatory autoimmune diseasesMethodologyRheumatoid arthritisTNF-α inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27421721
OpenAlexW2473657157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.