Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421468›Full record

ReviewRadiation protection dosimetry2016

Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Ann Barry Flood, Benjamin B Williams, Wilson Schreiber, Gaixin Du, Victoria A Wood, Maciej M Kmiec, Sergey V Petryakov, Eugene Demidenko, Harold M Swartz, EPR Center Tooth Dosimetry Project Team

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Saving normal tissues - a goal for the ages.International journal of radiation biology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. L Band EPR Tooth Dosimetry for Heavy Ion Irradiation.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ann Barry FloodEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA Ann.B.Flood@Dartmouth.edu.
Benjamin B WilliamsEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Wilson SchreiberEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Gaixin DuEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Victoria A WoodEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Maciej M KmiecEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Sergey V PetryakovEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Eugene DemidenkoDept. of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Harold M SwartzEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Radiology Dept., Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
EPR Center Tooth Dosimetry Project Team

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several important recent advances in the development and evolution of in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) allow its performance to meet or exceed the U.S. targeted requirements for accuracy and ease of operation and throughput in a large-scale radiation event. Ergonomically based changes to the magnet, coupled with the development of rotation of the magnet and advanced software to automate collection of data, have made it easier and faster to make a measurement. From start to finish, measurements require a total elapsed time of 5 min, with data acquisition taking place in less than 3 min. At the same time, the accuracy of the data for triage of large populations has improved, as indicated using the metrics of sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve. Applying these standards to the intended population, EPR in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry has approximately the same diagnostic accuracy as the purported 'gold standard' (dicentric chromosome assay). Other improvements include miniaturisation of the spectrometer, leading to the creation of a significantly lighter and more compact prototype that is suitable for transporting for Point of Care (POC) operation and that can be operated off a single standard power outlet. Additional advancements in the resonator, including use of a disposable sensing loop attached to the incisor tooth, have resulted in a biodosimetry method where measurements can be made quickly with a simple 5-step workflow and by people needing only a few minutes of training (which can be built into the instrument as a training video). In sum, recent advancements allow this prototype to meet or exceed the US Federal Government's recommended targets for POC biodosimetry in large-scale events.

Indexed as

Biological AssayBiomarkersElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyHumansRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation MonitoringRadioactive Hazard ReleaseReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalToothTriageBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27421468
PMCPMC5225975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.