Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421184›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Multi-center MRI prediction models: Predicting sex and illness course in first episode psychosis patients.

Mireille Nieuwenhuis, Hugo G Schnack, Neeltje E van Haren, Julia Lappin, Craig Morgan, Antje A Reinders, Diana Gutierrez-Tordesillas, Roberto Roiz-Santiañez, Maristela S Schaufelberger, Pedro G Rosa and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mireille NieuwenhuisDepartment of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mireillen@gmail.com.
Hugo G SchnackDepartment of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Neeltje E van HarenDepartment of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Julia LappinDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.
Craig MorganCenter for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Antje A ReindersCenter for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Diana Gutierrez-TordesillasNeuroimaging Unit, Technological Facilities, Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain; CIBERSAM, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Roberto Roiz-SantiañezCIBERSAM, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Maristela S SchaufelbergerLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Centro de Medicina Nuclear, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pedro G RosaLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Centro de Medicina Nuclear, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcus V ZanettiLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Centro de Medicina Nuclear, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Geraldo F BusattoLaboratory of Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Centro de Medicina Nuclear, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Benedicto Crespo-FacorroCIBERSAM, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain; Department of Medicine and Psychiatry, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria-IDIVAL-CIBERSAM, Santander, Spain.
Patrick D McGorryDepartment of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dennis VelakoulisDepartment of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Christos PantelisDepartment of Psychiatry, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephen J WoodSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK.
René S KahnDepartment of Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janaina Mourao-MirandaDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.
Paola DazzanDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK; NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Center at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College, London, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0500817Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT086565/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust WT102845/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies have attempted to use brain measures obtained at the first-episode of psychosis to predict subsequent outcome, with inconsistent results. Thus, there is a real need to validate the utility of brain measures in the prediction of outcome using large datasets, from independent samples, obtained with different protocols and from different MRI scanners. This study had three main aims: 1) to investigate whether structural MRI data from multiple centers can be combined to create a machine-learning model able to predict a strong biological variable like sex; 2) to replicate our previous finding that an MRI scan obtained at first episode significantly predicts subsequent illness course in other independent datasets; and finally, 3) to test whether these datasets can be combined to generate multicenter models with better accuracy in the prediction of illness course. The multi-center sample included brain structural MRI scans from 256 males and 133 females patients with first episode psychosis, acquired in five centers: University Medical Center Utrecht (The Netherlands) (n=67); Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London (United Kingdom) (n=97); University of São Paulo (Brazil) (n=64); University of Cantabria, Santander (Spain) (n=107); and University of Melbourne (Australia) (n=54). All images were acquired on 1.5-Tesla scanners and all centers provided information on illness course during a follow-up period ranging 3 to 7years. We only included in the analyses of outcome prediction patients for whom illness course was categorized as either "continuous" (n=94) or "remitting" (n=118). Using structural brain scans from all centers, sex was predicted with significant accuracy (89%; p<0.001). In the single- or multi-center models, illness course could not be predicted with significant accuracy. However, when reducing heterogeneity by restricting the analyses to male patients only, classification accuracy improved in some samples. This study provides proof of concept that combining multi-center MRI data to create a well performing classification model is possible. However, to create complex multi-center models that perform accurately, each center should contribute a sample either large or homogeneous enough to first allow accurate classification within the single-center.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicDisease ProgressionMulticenter Studies as TopicAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProof of Concept StudyPsychotic DisordersSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27421184
PMCPMC5193177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.