ArticleNeuroImage2017
Multi-center MRI prediction models: Predicting sex and illness course in first episode psychosis patients.
Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychotic relapse prediction via biomarker monitoring: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning of structural MRI predicts fluid, crystallized, and general intelligence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multivariable prediction of functional outcome after first-episode psychosis: a crossover validation approach in EUFEST and PSYSCAN.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the relationship between magnetic resonance image quality metrics and deep learning-based segmentation accuracy of brain tumors.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Brain identification of IBS patients based on GBDT and multiple imaging techniques.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence in adolescents mental health disorder diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Combining MRI and clinical data to detect high relapse risk after the first episode of psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Bipolar spectrum disorders are associated with increased gray matter volume in the medial orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens.JCPP advances · 2022Article
- Development of machine learning models for mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2022Article
- Advances in Using MRI to Estimate the Risk of Future Outcomes in Mental Health - Are We Getting There?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- The impact of harmonization on radiomic features in Parkinson's disease and healthy controls: A multicenter study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Reduced TMS-evoked fast oscillations in the motor cortex predict the severity of positive symptoms in first-episode psychosis.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021Article
- Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Review
- Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1-year follow-up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Baseline brain structural and functional predictors of clinical outcome in the early course of schizophrenia.Molecular psychiatry · 2020Article
- Towards Precision Medicine in Psychosis: Benefits and Challenges of Multimodal Multicenter Studies-PSYSCAN: Translating Neuroimaging Findings From Research into Clinical Practice.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2020Article
- Quantifying the Impact of Chronic Ischemic Injury on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Stroke With Machine Learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Progress in psychoradiology, the clinical application of psychiatric neuroimaging.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies have attempted to use brain measures obtained at the first-episode of psychosis to predict subsequent outcome, with inconsistent results. Thus, there is a real need to validate the utility of brain measures in the prediction of outcome using large datasets, from independent samples, obtained with different protocols and from different MRI scanners. This study had three main aims: 1) to investigate whether structural MRI data from multiple centers can be combined to create a machine-learning model able to predict a strong biological variable like sex; 2) to replicate our previous finding that an MRI scan obtained at first episode significantly predicts subsequent illness course in other independent datasets; and finally, 3) to test whether these datasets can be combined to generate multicenter models with better accuracy in the prediction of illness course. The multi-center sample included brain structural MRI scans from 256 males and 133 females patients with first episode psychosis, acquired in five centers: University Medical Center Utrecht (The Netherlands) (n=67); Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London (United Kingdom) (n=97); University of São Paulo (Brazil) (n=64); University of Cantabria, Santander (Spain) (n=107); and University of Melbourne (Australia) (n=54). All images were acquired on 1.5-Tesla scanners and all centers provided information on illness course during a follow-up period ranging 3 to 7years. We only included in the analyses of outcome prediction patients for whom illness course was categorized as either "continuous" (n=94) or "remitting" (n=118). Using structural brain scans from all centers, sex was predicted with significant accuracy (89%; p<0.001). In the single- or multi-center models, illness course could not be predicted with significant accuracy. However, when reducing heterogeneity by restricting the analyses to male patients only, classification accuracy improved in some samples. This study provides proof of concept that combining multi-center MRI data to create a well performing classification model is possible. However, to create complex multi-center models that perform accurately, each center should contribute a sample either large or homogeneous enough to first allow accurate classification within the single-center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.