Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421064›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

Determinants related to gender differences in general practice utilization: Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Cohort.

Jeanette Therming Jørgensen, John Sahl Andersen, Anne Tjønneland, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Healthcare Utilization and Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms among Urban Older Malaysian.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeanette Therming Jørgensena Centre for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
John Sahl Andersenb Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
Anne Tjønnelandc Danish Centre for Cancer Research , Danish Cancer Society , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Zorana Jovanovic Andersena Centre for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to describe the determinants related to gender differences in the GP utilization in Danish population aged 50-65 years.

designCohort-based cross-sectional study.

settingDanish general practice. SUBJECTS: Totally, 54,849 participants of the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (50-65 years).

main outcome measuresThe sum of cohort members' face-to-face consultations with general practitioner (GP) at the cohort baseline year (1993-1997). We obtained data on GP visits from the Danish National Health Service Register at the cohort baseline (1993-1997), when information on lifestyle (smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol use, physical activity), medical conditions (somatic and mental), employment, education, gravidity, and hormone therapy (HT) use was collected by questionnaire.

resultsWomen had on average 4.1 and men 2.8 consultations per year. In a crude model, women had 47% higher rate of GP visits than men (incidence rate ratio: 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.45-1.50), which remained unchanged after adjustment for lifestyle, socio-demographic and medical factors, but attenuated to 18% (1.18; 1.13-1.24) after adjustment for female factors (gravidity and post-menopausal HT. In a fully adjusted model, subjects with hypertension (1.63; 1.59-1.67), mental illness (1.63; 1.61-1.66), diabetes (1.56; 1.47-1.65), angina pectoris (1.28; 1.21-1.34), and unemployed persons (1.19; 1.18-1.21) had highest rates of GP visits.

conclusionsGravidity and HT use explain a large proportion, but not all of the gender difference in GP utilization. Medical conditions (somatic and mental) and unemployment are the main determinants of GP utilization in men and women, while lifestyle has minor effect. Key points Female gender remained a dominant determinant of GP utilization, after adjustment for lifestyle, socio-demography, medical and gender specific factors, with females consulting their GP 18% more often than males. Female reproductive factors (use of postmenopausal hormone therapy and gravidity) explained a large proportion of the gender variation in use of GP. Strongest determinants for GP use among Danish adults aged 50-65 years were the presence of medical conditions (somatic and mental) and unemployment, while lifestyle factors (e.g., body mass index, alcohol consumption and smoking) had minor effect.

Indexed as

Health StatusAgedAge DistributionChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesDenmarkDietFemaleGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersGravidityHealth BehaviorHormonesHumansMaleMental DisordersHormonesCohortDenmarkgendergeneral practicehealth service uselifestyleunemployment

Identifiers

PMID27421064
PMCPMC5036013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.