Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27421049›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2016

"It is better to die": experiences of traditional health practitioners within the HIV treatment as prevention trial communities in rural South Africa (ANRS 12249 TasP trial).

Mosa Moshabela, Thembelihle Zuma, Joanna Orne-Gliemann, Collins Iwuji, Joseph Larmarange, Nuala McGrath, ANRS 12249 TasP Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mosa Moshabelaa Africa Centre for Population Health , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Mtubatuba , South Africa.
Thembelihle Zumaa Africa Centre for Population Health , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Mtubatuba , South Africa.
Joanna Orne-Gliemannc INSERM U1219 - Centre Inserm Bordeaux Population Health , Université de Bordeaux , Bordeaux , France.
Collins Iwujia Africa Centre for Population Health , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Mtubatuba , South Africa.
Joseph Larmarangea Africa Centre for Population Health , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Mtubatuba , South Africa.
Nuala McGratha Africa Centre for Population Health , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Mtubatuba , South Africa.
ANRS 12249 TasP Study Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ANRS 12249 Treatment-as-Prevention (TasP) cluster-randomized trial in rural South Africa uses a "test and treat" approach. Home-based testing services and antiretroviral treatment initiation satellite clinics were implemented in every cluster as part of the trial. A social science research agenda was nested within TasP with the aim of understanding the social, economic and contextual factors that affect individuals, households, communities and health systems with respect to TasP. Considering the rural nature of the trial setting, we sought to understand community perceptions and experiences of the TasP Trial interventions as seen through the eyes of traditional health practitioners (THPs). A qualitative study design was adopted using four repeat focus group discussions conducted with nine THPs, combined with community walks and photo-voice techniques, over a period of 18 months. A descriptive, interpretive and explanatory approach to analysis was adopted. Findings indicate that THPs engaged with the home-based testing services and HIV clinics established for TasP. Specifically, home-based testing services were perceived as relatively successful in increasing access to HIV testing. A major gap observed by THPs was linkage to HIV clinics. Most of their clients, and some of the THPs themselves, found it difficult to use HIV clinics due to fear of labelling, stigma and discrimination, and the ensuing personal implications of unsolicited disclosure. On the one hand, a growing number of patients diagnosed with HIV have found sanctuary with THPs as alternatives to clinics. On the other hand, THPs in turn have been struggling to channel patients suspected of HIV into clinics through referrals. Therefore, acceptability of the TasP test and treat approach by THPs is a major boost to the intervention, but further success can be achieved through strengthened ties with communities to combat stigma and effectively link patients into HIV care, including partnerships with THPs themselves.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial StigmaAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBiomedical ResearchDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMalePerceptionPrejudiceQualitative ResearchAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral treatmentHIV stigmaHIV testingSouth Africatraditional healerstreatment-as-prevention

Identifiers

PMID27421049
PMCPMC5096678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.